Section 62 of indian evidence act
Guest
(Querist) 16 September 2018
This query is : Resolved
Plaintiff deposes that he had taken 23 photographs when the illegal construction of the additional room above the suit premises was going on, the illegal and unauthorized construction has been marked with Red marking pen on the said 23 photographs. Plaintiff testifies that he took the the 23 Photographs with the negatives and submitted the original invoice dated ******** of the General Photo Studio for the development charges of the said 23 Photographs. Plaintiff says that they are true and correct and he identifies the same. Plaintiff prays that it may be taken on record and marked as Exhibit. Photographs have been snapped by Plaintiff himself
My query is:-
Whether the photographs (taken by the plaintiff) and negatives (developed by the plaintiff through General Photo Studio through the original invoice for the development charges of the negatives) submitted in the court is admissible as evidence in court?
If Yes please provide me with proper judgements
Guest
(Expert) 16 September 2018
What specific objectionable lies in your post or your ID that you have been compelled to remain anonymous. Also, what is your objective of asking for judgments for the case? Both the issues indicate as if yours is not a real problem, rather a hypothetical academic question.
Guest
(Querist) 16 September 2018
i just got myself registered here didnt give much thought to post as anonymous just clicked it
its a real situation ive been researching on it but haven't found something accurate. There is a judgement which i have to challenge where the photographs with the negatives and the invoice of the photo studio for the development charges were not exhibited by the Court by giving an improper reasons
that they are required to be proved from the person who snapped the photographs and provided...
But in this case the plaintiff himself deposes that he took the photographs and got it developed from the studio......
Can the photographs taken by the plaintiff himself be admissible?
im from the plaintiffs side
Guest
(Querist) 16 September 2018
can the photographs taken by the plaintiff himself be admissible as evidence in Court?
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 18 September 2018
Is it not repetition of same query today itself? If so, it is ridiculous and absurd to repeat same story.
However, if some other author/query consult a local senior lawyer for appreciation of facts/document and guidance.
Why did you prefer to remain "anonymous" author as the experts do not oblige such persons as per rules of this platform?
Guest
(Expert) 18 September 2018
Yes same query and arrogance demonstrated on those by the author on the other posts. In facts arrogant students prefer to keep anonymous, so that they may not be identified, who misbehaves with the experts. They want free service, but can't tolerate when anyone questions about the relevance of their queries and the background of the case.
Anonymous querists do not deserve any help.
Guest
(Querist) 19 September 2018
@Vashista i made this post because this dhingra guy has been following my posts he just cant help but give stupid remarks i thought other learned experts would help me without them to have a look at his stupid posts well my query was resolved but as always dhingra has to have his say in the end
@Dhingra - Im not specifically forcing you to reply to me, your doing it by yourself are you really that small that you have to reply to all my posts, i made a different posts so i dont have to look at your posts its so low of you to follow my queries and answer them your help is not required mind your own business if you have one.
Honestly i don't even feel like replying you anymore because unlike you i have a life which doesn't revolve around stupid, idiotic, lethargic people like you who have zero application of mind who just needs to get the details of everything without any intention to help. I pity those who are even remotely connected to you. Thanks for giving me a better understanding of the kind of person you truly are which is arrogant, egoistic, full of yourself, selfish and lowly.
Guest
(Expert) 19 September 2018
Mr. Anonymous student with deleted profile with other fake name and identity, as "no man",
It is only some arrogant, senseless, and duffer students, who appear anonymously, who prefer not to apply their own minds and want to achieve their qualification with half baked borrowed knowledge, just to come out with degrees to become quacks and pick the pockets of the hapless laymen in the garb of lawyers .
.
I do not feel my 'ONLY DUTY', like some other experts as in the following thread, to help bring out quacks out of the the senseless, duffer and easygoing students, who prefer to get Degrees in law, but without their self acquired knowledge. No objection, if some experts feel pleasure to add quacks in the legal community. They may continue to discharge their so called only duty. However, only such type of contributors become the cause of insult of the experts by the arrogant anonymous students.
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Indian-evidence-act--692331.asp
