Evidence Act

Monish Nilwant (Querist) 07 May 2008 This query is : Resolved
Can Some one explain me is there a peovision in the evidence act which says that a 30 year old document is presumed to be valid and it cannot be challenged before the court of law as not being conclusive proof.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Monish Nilwant (Querist) 07 May 2008
8

TSBehera (Expert) 07 May 2008
There is a provision but if you find them false you must gather evidence otherwise document shall be admitted as evidence.Any contradictory document on same or similar matters shall suffice

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Refusal of execution of court order by adj
Forged document on fake stamp and forged signatures
Refusal of adj for compliance /execution of order passed
Quash fir
Jda real estate
Not received rent sunce from 8 months
Sexuall harrasment in work place
Sexuall harrasment in work place
Gluco extend
Pan card for the educational institutions

Following me so they will complain to police
Is advocate guilty?
Advocate�s duty to justice apply to the pre-litigation ?
Ucc laws on inheritance
Family settlement
Complaint against medical facility
Legal opinion on baseless legal notice and law
Legal notice or ........
Dismissals due to defective legal notices
Legal notice content