pc act

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 30 December 2010 This query is : Resolved
How the investigating agency establish demand, acceptance.

WHEN :
1. The work for which the bribe is being paid to a legal attorney engaged by him . nowhere in the voice transcription recordings it is shows there is a demand. Only the complainant repeatedly tells the money and the amount.
2. The govt employees cannot do that work. Neither they are dealing with the file nor they have jurisdiction nor empowered to do the same. Only the officer in the rank of cabinet secretary can do this work. no ldc or udc can do this work. and the officer has clearly mentioned in the letter given to the agency clearly mentioned the work of the accused.
3. His own attoney recevied the amount and was caught by the agency. Complainant another attorney says this amount belongs to some govt employees. then the other attorney was asked to contact those govt employees.
4.the attorney who wa caught red handed didnot know or have any time met those govt employees. But on the directions of agency and the other attorney he hands over the amt to the govt employee on some pretext. Even during his conversation with the govt employee there s no mentione of money or demand etc.

WILL THE CHARGES BE FRAMED.
SINCE THE GOVT EMPLOYEE DOES NOT KNOW FOR WHY THE MONEY WAS HANDED OVER TO HIM. HOW WILL HE MANAGE.
THESE TWO ATTORNEYS STATEMENTS IN COURT WILL BE OF ANY BENEFIT

Follow Query

Report Abuse