Section 14 (1)(e) drc act 1958
deepak garg
(Querist) 28 November 2012
This query is : Resolved
Dear sir
In eviction petition i filied that i required tenanted shop for trading of pvc pipes.
previously i was doing the manufacturing of pvc pipes from my premises at mundka ,delhi.But due to heavy losses i had to close the unit.
In leave to defend respondent had mentioned that the said bussiness of manufacturing of pvc pipes is doing good and the petitioner is indulged i the same bussiness.
But it is not true,i have shut down the said manufacturing plant ,but i don't have any proof.
will it have any affect on the case.
R.K Nanda
(Expert) 28 November 2012
it will weak ur case.u/s 14 (1) (e).DRCACT.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 28 November 2012
Law is very clear. Who so ever asserts must prove. The respondent is claiming that you are doing business of manufacturing and earning huge profits then let him prove. His oral evidence shall not work before your documentary evidence which establish that you suffered heavy losses and have closed that manufacturing.
Otherwise also, the tenant has got no right to raise question mark over the landlord. A landlord may start his new work, He may do many businesses at the same time. Who is tenant to stop his landlord not to earn more profits from his more and more businesses?
The plea of respondent shall not work and you shall definitely get your shop evicted as pr latest law.
