International law and icj
rajesh
(Querist) 09 November 2012
This query is : Resolved
dear sir/madam when there is a treaty between 2 countries and both have dispute regarding the same and both have agreed to go before the ICJ, in such a case what are the parties reffered to as? when one country approaches the ICJ he is referred to as applicant and the opposite party as respondent but in the present case what are the parties reffered to as?
R.K Nanda
(Expert) 09 November 2012
country which files first will be called as
petitioner country and opposite country will be called as respondent country in ICJ.
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 09 November 2012
Thanks' GOD it was NOT denoted as ACADEMIC query\
which is usual practice,MORE PARTICULARLY BY THE LEARNED EXPERT WHO SPOKE ABOVE .
Hence I have right to speak about FREELY.
My answer is that both countries would be parties through their constitutional/political heads.
rajesh
(Querist) 14 November 2012
Sir i was confused because in our moot problem there is a treaty and there is a breach of the treaty by both the sides ans so the prime ministers of both nations sign a compromise to go before ICJ together to settle their disputes...
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 25 November 2012
Academic query not required to be replied.
rajesh
(Querist) 25 November 2012
ohhh is it
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 25 November 2012
"in our moot problem there i"
moot not encouraged.
