Law of Inheritance n Succession in Mohammedan Law

Mohammed Raza (Querist) 10 July 2011 This query is : Resolved
A Muslim lady "X" died in 1988 n left a property (Land)behind her. The property was gifted by her mother n registered in her name. This property was neither purchased by her husband nor inherited from her husband's family. She has left (5) heirs behind her in the above property.
(1)Her Husband "Y"
(2)Her Elder Son "A"
(3)Her Elder Daughter "C"
(4)Her Younger Son "B"
(5)Her Younger Daughter "D"
"A" died in 1987
"D" died in 1990
"Y" died in 2002

"C" and "B" are alive now n claiming their share in this property as per Mohammedan Law in indian jurisdiction.

The questions I have are -

a) "A" the Elder Son dies BEFORE "X" n "Y". Does the A's wife n children are entitle to get their father's share in the above property which has left by "X"?

b) What would be the share of
"A" "B" "C" "D" in the above said property as per MOhammedan Law?

As per my knowledge in Mohammedan Law if a son died before their parents (Father & Mother)his wife N children not entitle to get share in property. Is it correct?

No partitioning has yet been done.

The situation relates to a Sunni Muslim family in India.

Thanks in advance N Eagerly waiting for kind advice

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Tajobsindia (Expert) 20 September 2012
Since the queriest is not interested in pursuing the query after placing it here from last 1 year, hence closing this query by hitting Resolved drop down.

Guest (Expert) 20 September 2012
Dear Tajobsindia,

I wonder, when nobody tried to solve the problem of the querist, instead of providing any solution, how you have assumed the query to have been solved when the querist has not declared so? Not only that, you have declared on behalf of several other querists that their queries have been solved without any solution on those queries.

Tajobsindia (Expert) 20 September 2012
Mr. Dhingra,

These is a huge meaning difference between "not pursuing" and "solved".

You are using 'solved' word which is not the right word to use here. Also "queriest" means a person asking a query with reference to Expert section where Expert reply to a "query".

I used word "not pursuing" from last 1 year by no one (which includes you and by me).

Here "several others" means several other "Experts".

If we as Experts colly. fail to answer a 'query' from last 1 year and on top "queriest" himself does not show any interest to pursue his own query then before questioning me you could have solved yourself the persons query !

If you have right to question me so do I have same rights as we both were cleared as Experts for this section by Admins. of LCI.

I am sure now rest of fellow Experts including you will question my above explanation and probably still no one including me will attempt to solve this query even after 1 year. I followed what Court does when a suit matter gets dismissed “due to non pursual by party”

You probably will not question Court after 1 year but you may question me which I found amusing after 1 year.

In that case I am done clarifying / explaining here and now you may react as per your wishes or choose to close this irrational Q & A or still not satisfied then you including all Experts here may directly tell Mods. to delete my a/c what else you expect me to do seeing after 1 year a OPEN query ????.

Rgds.

Guest (Expert) 20 September 2012
Dear Tajobsindia,

I hope you would like to reply just one simple question for my information, do you have any right or authority to declare on behalf of the querist or administrator of the site that the matter pertaining to his querry or problem is resolved?

Law of Inheritance n Succession in Mohammedan Law

Similar Resolved Queries :