Re: got interim bail in 498a case
SAM
(Querist) 23 May 2017
This query is : Open
Dear Lawyers,
Please provide me your feedback in this case. I have got interim bail from Sessions court. Do reply me with your comments. Please find below mentioned Order passed by the Hon'ble Sessions Judge
Regards,
Sam
ORDER BELOW EXH. 3 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL
APPLICATION NO. 1283 /2017.
1. Perused application.
Heard Ld. counsel Shri. J.A. Azmi, for applicants.
2. Ld. counsel for the applicants submitted that applicant no. 1 is husband of complainant Shilpa, whereas applicant no.2 and 3 are close relatives
of accused no. 1 Somu Anand Ramteke. Marriage between applicant no. 1 and complainant was solemnized on 20th June, 2012. After marriage, she came to the house of her husband for cohabitation at Mira Road.
It is alleged by the prosecution that accused in furtherance of their common intention, subjected her to cruelty, beaten her, abused and threatened her. Complainant was never illtreated, but after about 8 months of the marriage, she was left to her parent's house at Sakoli, Dist. Bhandara. Though several attempts were made to bring
her back, she did not turn to her matrimonial house.
3. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, nothing is to be recovered from the applicants. Hence, in my view, custodial interrogation of applicants is not necessary and interim protection can be granted. Hence, the order.
ORDER
1] In the event of arrest of applicants namely Somu Anand Ramteke, Sumedh Anand Ramteke and Smt. Jyoti Anand Ramteke, they be released on P.R. bond of Rs.20,000/each with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount each in C.R. No. I of 218 of 2017, Kashimira police station, for the offences
punishable under section 498A, 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C., on following conditions.
a) The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required.
b) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.
c) The applicants shall not leave Konkan region without the previous permission of the Court.
d) The applicants shall not commit any other offence or similar offence.
2] Issue showcause notice why adinterim
anticipatory bail should not be confirmed. R/o. 25.05.2017.
Date: 17.05.2017.
(A.S. Bhaisare)
Additional Sessions Judge 3,
Thane.
