(Guest)

438 Cr.Pc Anticipatory Bail

438 Cr.Pc Anticipatory Bail 438 Cr.Pc is not valid in UP and Uttrakhand. Whereas it exists in all state of India even in terrorist affected states. Allahabad High Court has issued lot of ordinance to restore provision for anticipatory bail. But it has been ever negated. Strong recommendation to UP govt. to do so immediately- Seven judge bench of Allahabad High Court held in “Amarawati Vs State of UP, 2005 Cr.LJ 755 That on during pendency of bail application u/s 439 Cr.pc session Judge can grant interim bail till final disposal of bail application.

Reply Follow

7 Replies

PJANARDHANA REDDY (ADVOCATE & DIRECTOR) 25 December 2010

YOU ARE RIGHT, TO BUT QUASH BENCH OF UP & UTTARAKHAND IS ALLOWING NOT ARREST DIRECTIONS TO POLICE WHICH IS EQUALLENT TO AB.

PJANARDHANA REDDY (ADVOCATE & DIRECTOR) 25 December 2010

PLS READ THIS JUDGEMENT

Attached File : 50 50 bail judgment by allahabad h c.pdf downloaded: 344 times

yusufkhan (legal service) 25 December 2010

lettest judgement by the apex court on dated 2.12.10 judge name dalbeersingh

PJANARDHANA REDDY (ADVOCATE & DIRECTOR) 25 December 2010

PLS GO THAT ALSO

Attached File : 11 11 a b before fir full bench sc pdf 2.pdf downloaded: 280 times

Rohit (Private) 28 December 2010

Dear Mr. Reddy

When the court issues the Not Arrest directions.
Is it before the filing of FIR or pls give some details, how and when to proceed for this.

Thanks
Rohit

Rohit (Private) 28 December 2010

Dear Mr. Reddy

When the court issues the Not Arrest directions.
Is it before the filing of FIR or pls give some details, how and when to proceed for this.

Thanks
Rohit

PJANARDHANA REDDY (ADVOCATE & DIRECTOR) 28 December 2010

IT IS ALSO EQUAL AS AB DIRECTIONS,EVEN AFTER FIR/CHARGESHEET .

438 Cr.Pc Anticipatory Bail

7 Replies

Leave a reply

Recent Topics

Related Threads

Popular Discussion

Browse by Category