LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Srinivas (.)     15 December 2014

498a-high court

Hi Sir, Wife filed 498 on me only on 03.09.2013 and Divorce filed u/s 13 1ia, ib by wife and FIR only my name mentioned and Remand Report they mentioned my parents names also. I applied in AP Highcourt 498a quash including FIR Certified copy and Remand Report certify copy and Divorce certify copy and other evidences on 17.11.2014.

When I checked the status in AP High court website status is showing like -POSTING STAGE is  'FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ' and LISITING DATE  is :  30.01.2015 and STATUS is "NOTICES" and STAY PETITION is PENDING. But we have hearing in Lower court on 06.01.2015 in JFCM Court. Please advise wheather I have to attend hearing on 06.01.2015 in JFCM Court  or not ? Please advise. Thanks for ur time



Learning

 3 Replies

NATARAJAN IYER (Proprietor)     16 December 2014

 

 I have already answered you in the private message you sent me.

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate)     23 December 2014

The same query has been repeated many times by you despite you have been properly addressed by me as well as many experts. Please do not waste your time by becoming over anxious over the issue, understand the answers given to you or be in touch with your lawyer.

NATARAJAN IYER (Proprietor)     23 December 2014

You are Lucky... This has come in today....

Dec 23 2014 : The Times of India (Bangalore)
 
Judges can't issue non-bailable warrant without reason: HC
Bengaluru:
 

 

 
 
The Karnataka High Court has said that a magistrate or sessions judge cannot issue non-bailable warrant (NBW) without assigning specific reasons.

“It is incumbent on the magistrate or the sessions judge to satisfy him self whether a non-baila ble warrant should be is sued on account of compelling circumstances,“ Justice A N Venugoapala Gowda said in his order while quashing the nonbailable warrant issued by an additional city civil and session judge to 55 persons.

According to the Criminal Procedure Code, there is no obligation on the part of an accused to appear before the court, the judge said, adding that if there is no violation of bail conditions, an NBW would violate the accused’s fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution.

The 55 petitioners, 50 of them hailing from Gujarat and others from Rajasthan, had challenged the October 23, 2014 NBW issued by the session judge, who is also officiating as special judge for Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) cases.

On July 12, 2014, the CCB police (N T Pete) had registered cases against the petitioners along with six others for offences under Sections 79, 80 of the Karnataka Police Act , section 34 of Karnataka Excise Act and section 20(b) of the NDPS Act for betting and possession of illicit liquor and marijuana.

The petitioners claimed that since they were on bail and no charge sheet had been filed due to non-completion of the investigation, there was no necessity for them to appear before the court. The petitioners, who were granted bail along with the other six, did not appear in court on October 23, 2014 and also did not seek exemption as done by the others.



Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register