Bom HC: All income sources be considered to calculate maint

@ Author

1.     It is not clear from a news item if husband went to HC appeal against money to first wife OR against that now he is married so no maint. to first wife?

Above besides the point as per news bite the HC direction is gender biased is my comment. Only for husbands they say so, what about any other wife’s cases before HC, have any author heard any HC saying that – NO I is my view.

So it is a gender biased direction of Lordships since a male is appellant.

2.     Note I am not commenting on merits and other stuffs though as full text of news item is not available.

The learned Judge is absolutely right that all the sources of income to be considered while deciding the Pendent Lite Expanses. However the expenses are awarded as a matter of right to the opposite party. These expenses are awarded considering the income of the party demanding the PL and his/her requirement to maintain his or her self during the pendancy of case.

So this is a good judgement.