A court has passed the following order
"State V/s XYZ
Prersent APP For the STATE
Accused XYZ and CDF on bail with their counsel
Accused ABC Kaumar is also on bail, buit, has not come present today
On his behalf an application for exemption has been filed by his counsel.In view of the facts mentioned in the APPLICATION ,personal appearance of ABC is dispensed with for today onl;y and he be produced on the nest date of hearing.NO application for exenption shall be enetertained on the next date of hearing on behalf of any of the accused.
Copies of documents of challan have been supplied to the accused XYZ vide his separate statement.
Today an application has been moved by accused through his sounsel for suppliying the challan in hindi language. The court has not got any provision to get it translated because the challan has been presented in Punjabi language and in pUnjab court language is punjabi and challan has been presented in punjabi language. Accused is at liberty to get it transalted at his own expenses.
Application is not sustainable and same is hereby dismissed.NOw case is adjourned for arguments on framing of charges."
Now the Question arise :-
When the accused is not know the Language in which challan has been supplied, it is not the duty of the court to supply the challan in the language known to the accused as to defend himself as provided in Article 14 & 21 of Constitution of india.
IF YES
IN WHICH SECTION AND UNDER WHICH ACT/RULE
Kindly provide the citation n support.