Ashok Kumar M (Farmer) 30 August 2018
P. Venu (Advocate) 30 August 2018
Does the Order rejecting the IA been state that "it is the duty of husband to maintain wife"?
Ashok Kumar M (Farmer) 30 August 2018
Hi Sir, Thank you for responding. Yes it states that it's the duty of husband to maintain wife by providing basic necessisities. The IA filed was not related to maintenance. It was just to issue summons to the College & Bank to prove to the court that she is capable woman and working. But, looks like judge has misintrepreted.
P. Venu (Advocate) 31 August 2018
It is prudent to follow your lawyer's advice.
Ashok Kumar M (Farmer) 31 August 2018
Sir, Thank you for your time in responding. The present situation is -
1. The divorce case was filed in 2014 and it was transferred to her convenient place in 2015. Ever since, it's on a steady progress.
2. I am already paying her the maintenance of Rs. 2000/- under HMA 24 order.
3. The case is at the final stage for arguments. At this stage, I found out her source of employment, income that she is working as a Sr. Lecturer in a dental college
4. In her prayer (Objections to the divorce petition), she is asking for a) Dismiss the petition at an exemplary cost b) Direct the petitioner to pay Rs. 75000/- p.m. as permanent alimony
5. I have lost lucrative employment because of the continuous harassment, pending criminal cases and unable to renew my passport.
6. The lady never attends any court but used to send her father to give excuses for her absence with the only intention to drag the proceedings. Her father has recently passed away. As such, they know that she will never get married again and want to spoil my life too.
7. The present IA was filed to recall the petition & include 2 witnesses (Principal & Bank manager) to further cross examin them. Thus, it would help us to position the case in a better way to prove that she is earning
8. Now that it is rejected by the judge, my present lawyer is advising me to go to high court and challenge the order
9. Other advocates are suggesting me that it will be waste of time to challenge the IA. Instead, let the case go on with the arguments and order. If the final order goes in her favour, the same can be challenged in the high court. This would save time, money etc.
10. It's already 8 years passed. I am also thinking of expediting the matter in the lower court. At the same time, I am worried about the final order...in case if he orders the permanent alimony to her. Some of my friends & advocates are warning that if there is a permanent alimony rewarded to her, I need to pay the arrears, despite it is in the higher court for appeal.
Please advise me
P. Venu (Advocate) 31 August 2018
When you have a lawyer and there is no deficiency in his competence, it is wise to follow his advice.