This is just a story created by Media and women called Shyamla. Every coin has 2 parts. There might be possibility that this women had extra marital affairs and she got AIDS from other person and then it got transferred to her actual husband and her husband died.  Women are very chalu type of creatures GOD created in this earth.  I like the statement of Shekhar Yadav at the end “We have no role to play, if she is alleging and fabricating the case let the court decide.”  Court will have to decide who is wrong and who is right.

What a reply Hora Ji!  

There are a lot of beautiful names and adjectives gifted to women in this forum, one more, i.e., Chalu,  in women's kitty.  So how did you reach the conclusion that what this woman has said is false without verdict of the court?  And since so many times judgement of the courts have been questioned by some in this forum, describing them as  gender biased judgement, in this case, if the judgement remains in favour of this woman, it would be called a gender biased judgement. And if it remains in favour of man., then would not there be any question mark from the suffering woman, if she is still alive, or the ones--women and men both-- who are supporting her? 

One may not mind raising the question on the authenticity  of the news, but how does it make all women Chalu and that too Chalu as a God given quality ( if at all if the woman concerned has cooked up a story)? And why to drag God into our mundane affairs and embarrass him/her?  

this woman must have v.strong reasons for trying so hard to register a case against her inlaws,even when she's dying.....how can someone struggle so much when he's so ill and dying?it's simple common sense...

now she is poor.so she cant even bribe judges,police etc to "extort" money....and if people say she's trying to extort,her husband who's supposedly an ATM machine is already dead

moreover there's no "false" dowry harassment case which women are tarnished for filing

even assuming(repeat assuming) the opening story as 100% correct, it is hazardous to generalize from a single instance.

This is what this lady is doing in this forum for the last few months!

While Jogeshwar ji has a point here, I would like to point out to cool that flasshing news items and connecting them with the larger issues has not been done by this lady alone...many men in the family  forum have  done it . So let us remain balanced when we comment on someone in a personal way. 

@ Jogeshwar ji

Though while agreeing with you that one particular case should not lead to generalization, I would also like to point out that grassroots work on GBV and HIV/AIDS have pointed out that HIV/AIDS affected women face severe  stigma and discrimination and have  a higher rates of rejection from their  natal as well as  matrimonial homes and by the society at large than the stigma and its consequences faced by men in general. 

Thanks Renuka Ji. Appreciate your point!

1) News trend does  reflect social conditions. Even though 1 instance may not be enough but cannot be blindly dismissed.

2) It is extremely difficult to get justice for everyone in this country. It is not just problem of  people of particular language, caste, color, religion, s*x etc. Examples: Bhopal gas victims, 1984 masacare victims, Gujrat masacare victims. Victims are dying of old age but no justice. Entire judicial system needs to be overhauled.

3) I am not saying that women do not play games or men do not play games. Laws should be balanced and justice delivery should be efficient and fair. It is a fact that quality of justice delivery has become pathetic with increase in load of cases in courts.

4) It is not sufficient to just write on this forum. I would request Aishwarya and Renuka Gupata to also contact National Commission for Women, other organisations and present the facts that are happening so that rational and just laws should evolve. Also contact your MPs, MLAs as an organisation and make tell them your problems. Politicians only understand the language of votes.

5) I strongly protest and denounce the sweeping, derogratory and obnoxious remarks like "Women are very chalu type of creatures". Agreed they may have some biased mind arising due to some bad experience with women but what these people are forgetting is when they are making sweeping remarks against all women, they are also including their mothers, sisters and daughters. They are also somebodies wives. These people should apologize unconditionally and desist from making such remarks without thinking.

From woman, man is born; within woman, man is conceived; to woman he is engaged and married.  Woman becomes his friend; through woman, the future generations come.  When his woman dies, he seeks another woman; to woman he is bound.  So why call her bad? From her, kings are born.  From woman, woman is born; without woman, there would be no one at all. Guru Nanak, Raag Aasaa Mehal 1, Page 4

Well, in another thread I have seen Mr. Hora has again used the expression women vampires and this is just unacceptable. I have sent in the expression along with the thread to the admin. 

I wonder why people can't put forth their views without using such abusive language, and Democratic Indian you are right 

Take the premise

All women are chalu

See the logic 

All women are chalu

I  have my mother and sister

They are women

They are chalu

Here I am not even talking about wives!

Most of the women shy away from invoking law and most of the cases goes unreported, Also there financial dependence restricts them from approaching court. It is very tough for a woman to fight lengthy and harsh court battles.

Ashutosh Jayaswal has mentioned a fact. 498A, DV, court baazi etc. is the last resort for most sensible women. I have seen undeducated, semi educated women been beaten, abused and terrorised violently by their husbands. These women are those who do not have "muscle power" of brothers and relatives to keep the errant husband in check and their parents are poor. This women cannot be ignored. Even educated women are also victims who do not have backing from their families.

498A is abused by some women who should not be using it, BUT is not being used by women for whom it has been created. This is the problem.

I beg to differ from Ashutosh and Democratic Indian on the conditions of the women who approaches or do not approaches the court. If a wife has to file a false case under any section, she doesn't look for financial powers, her relatives, brothers, father etc. False 498A wives do not need any kind of support form anybody, they can fight on their own also.

I agree that it is NOT being used by the women for whom it was created. This is the real problem.