Not very long ago, on one of Rashni's post about some judge demanding dowery, some members had pointed out that this type of sensational news should not to be taken at its face value without going into the facts as and when they are available. Now the approach sees to be a bit different. There in the news the culprit was a man, here in the news the culprit a woman. The former news was not taken at face value by many members, the present one is taken at face value by many members.
Can't we wait for some more facts to emerge before passing judgements ( in both cases).
Why did she do it? What would have happened within the four walls of the house? Any explanation from the wife? Assumi Ji, the judge is an ordinary human being in his wife with all his virtues and blind spots.
While condemning the incident in no uncertain terms, if it is true, we should also know that it is a bit of a news( not properly fleshed out )very sketchily written.
BTW, anyone have watched the movie PROVOKED? based on true incidence, from which British Judiciary had leart a lot on some vital facts on Domestic Violence ( from the true incident)?