LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More


(Guest)

Is legal terrorism advocates fit term for woman organization

Supremen court has termed dowry law ( 498A of I.P.C) as legal terrorism.

Lets see a case to understand why.

This boy is studious.. studies in best instituation of our country and becomes director of one of the best known internet firm in a short while. He marries in a well connected family and marriage was dowryless. 

Soon they realise that they are incompatible. Verbal spat became rule rather than exception.  After 1.5 years of marriage the girl leaves her matrimonial home and goes to her parents.

After a few days,  in the middle of night, police comes and arrests him.

Next day newspaper reads ' Hard times makes techie demand dowry'

The person is in zail for X days comes out and gives taste of the same medicine to their in laws.  They come back running and settles.

This person has never had a brush with law,before  is one of the most productive, sincere member of ourt society and one of laws terrorizes him for months if not years.

What that law should be called which terrorises  the best of best of our society?

What the organization should be called which professes implicating people in such law  as a tool to settle score?

 



Learning

 24 Replies

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     19 December 2010

498A Talibans!

VictimOfBiasLaw (Professional)     19 December 2010

Andha kanoon

Who stupid made this law , i don't know why  people , lawyer , judge don't stood togather to fight against this kind of terror.

if Lawyer/judge getting money to fight case , please don't take this false DV case.

you don't earning money but supporting terrorisam

due to this law more and more boys avoiding marriage and going for livinin relationship

for woman marriage is earning good money from boys. 

Even judge know that girl has filed false DV case just to haraase in-laws and get money , he can't do anything as he abide by law , rediculas this is india and we are indian , hypocratic people

Ham pure world me apni marriage institution ka dhol pit-te hai , but all are hypocracy

VictimOfBiasLaw (Professional)     19 December 2010

Don't wait , our parlament change law , these are deaf and blind people.

It is lawyers/judge/people has to do something ,

layer should boycott to fight false DV case.

i know lawyers/judge can do this ,  I request all Lawyer please don't take this kind of false case.

 

Pakistan/Mujahidin these are not terriorist , actual terrorist is our law/parlament and politician 

Avnish Kaur (Consultant)     19 December 2010

Today Sonia ji is saying we have worked for women (please read as by trying to eliminate men).

1 Like

ashish lal (Advocacy)     19 December 2010

I agree there is misuse of 498A. Parliament should make offence under this section bailable

Bhartiya No. 1 (Nationalist)     19 December 2010

 

This is one side of the coin and one sided views. Some husbands are facing problems due to the unjust behaviour of the most of the husbands. It will be better to demand stronger punishment for the erring husbands.

What if the newspaper reads that woman MLA thrashed by her husband and associate, Lady Sarpanch killed for Dowry, Software engineer and doctors got killed due to dowry. 

Arrest is must to prevent any threat to the bride. So there is nothing wrong with the law, only implementation is faulty.

 

Like this every law needs complete change, like sc/st atrocity act, various land laws, labour laws etc.  Anyone can misuse any law of this country.

 

False allegation by An sc/st is more than sufficient to make the life of anyone a hell. Below High Court no one will grant bail. news paper will read "Dabangs has slapped a Dalit". So this too must be abolished or should be made bailable offense.

 

 

1 Like

Avnish Kaur (Consultant)     19 December 2010

a mandatory arrest without any proof just on a verbal complaint is not justified at all.

1 Like

(Guest)

Some husbands are facing problems due to the unjust behaviour of the most of the husbands

--What is source of this statement.? How you can say that it is due  to most other husbands? Is it your gut feeling ? Or you are making things up .. any reference to any research, statistics.? Or is this your own opinion.?

 

For  newspaper headings... you can see similarity between the case  here in question. Some headlines are bought and others may be genuine. For genuine cases law will take it course.

 

But the fact is --this law is a terrorism tool and owmen terrorist organization are promoting it..

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     19 December 2010

" worked for women (please read as by trying to eliminate men)."

- exact defination.

Avnish Kaur (Consultant)     19 December 2010

GOVT DEFINITION

GAREEBI HATAO - REAL DEFINITION GAREEB HATAO

WOMEN PAR ATROCITIES HATAO - REAL DEFINITION MALES KA SAFAYA (ELIMINATE) KAR DO

SONIYA JI WAKE UP EVERYONE KNOWS UR EVIL DESIGNS

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     19 December 2010

"Some husbands are facing problems due to the unjust behavior of the most of the husbands"

 

It is really a nonsense statement.

 

Was it that, some of the husbands were facing problems due to the unjust behavior by most of the husbands - before passing the 498a & DV act?

 

Behaviors of husbands were same before passing the 498a & D.V.act. therefore the above statement is untrue.

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     19 December 2010

" Who stupid made this law "

- this law made by our perliament, wcich consist of, the president; the loksabha & the rajyasabha.

your anger is genuine, but a decent word expected.

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     19 December 2010

" It will be better to demand stronger punishment for the erring husbands"

 

- what is your prescripttion for innocent husbands victimised by wife?

Bhartiya No. 1 (Nationalist)     20 December 2010

 

"Some husbands are facing problems due to the unjust behavior of the most of the husbands"

 

Is a just statement and is the reason behind the need of the laws to protect the interest of women. 


"Behaviors of husbands were same before passing the 498a & D.V.act."


Here u /Mr. arup is true, really nothing has changed, neither behaviour nor attitude, rudeness and other attributes are still present. 

They/women are being victimized and suppressed since ages.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register