302/304(B) Statements of inlaws

yes, the original complainant is in-laws hence there statement shall considerable, the contradiction of the dates may be a errornious mistake.

The statements of the inlaws will taken in to considration at the time of the bail only .Contraindication in the dates is not so important here . Also mantion that what the FIR says in the matter .

As a matter of fact, if there is a proof of phone call that date will b taken to b the fact. If there is no phone call for either of those dates then you can easily prove the allegation to be false and their witness can b rejected by the court!

do you have the copy of inlaw's statement to Asst comissioner ?

the confusion created by the dates are important though they will say that it is a clarical mistake.

therefore the other points be checked by a good criminal lawyer. 

Dear learneds, at this point of time aren't we all discussing a vague question? Let the case come up for hearing in the court then one can submit arguement with evidence in his defense. The dates matter but that has to be submitted before the court either you wanted FIR to be quashed or trial to take place. Don't just start deliberating on something in supposition.

The court is the right forum to ask/answer such questions.

Regards

us 304b there is presumption us 113b evidence act courts shall presume tht burden is uopn accused to prove there innocence u have not mentioned any sucide note or any incriminating material against u its a matter of trial how ur lawyer examine prosecution witnesses to rebut prosecution story some how honble court can look intoi d matter frm d angle of 113b indian evidence act thy might have added 306 ipc in alternative insteag of 302 ipc