LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Sandeep (firm)     18 August 2011

Article 22(2) - nearest magistrate

Dear Sir,

Article 22(2) of the constitution states that :

Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.

 

If someone is arrested by police in state other than their homw state, what should we mean by nearest magistrate ?

 

Eg. Rajasthan police from Jaipur arrests someone in Delhi, then whether nearest magistarte will be in Delhi or Rajasthan. If it is Rajasthan, then whether it will in any district or Jaipur only.

Pls. comment and clarify.

 

Regards

 

Sandeep



Learning

 8 Replies

pratik (self working)     18 August 2011

good question.

akash kapoor (*************)     18 August 2011

The nearest megistrate is the megistrate for the Thana area in which the convict is apprehanded.

1 Like

m.lxman rao (self employed)     18 August 2011

a police officer authorized to make arrest without warrent such person can arrested at any place in India.  As per Sec,.57 of Cr.P.C the Accused person shall not be in the police custody beyond 24 hours except upon the permission of the court under sec.167 CrPC,  however, the time taken in the journey shall be excluded.  so the nearest magistrate shall be Jaipur but not Delhi, as the magistrate at Delhi lacks Jursdiction.

1 Like

N RAMESH. (Advocate Chennai. Formerly Civil Judge. Mobile.09444261613)     19 August 2011

If the police are not possible to travel to jurisdictional magistrate within 24 hours, they can produce the accused before the nearest (local) magistrate and can get remand order till they reach the jurisdictional magistrate.

That is what normally being done.

1 Like

kuldeep kumar (lawyers)     19 August 2011

delhi magistrate

1 Like

kuldeep kumar (lawyers)     19 August 2011

mr lsman rao why it should not be delhi magistrate?

1 Like

kvss.prabhakar rao (Advocate )     19 August 2011

Mr N. Ramesh Version is correct. When a accused  other than locla limits of Magistrate the police officer should prooduce the accused before local Magistrate and would get transit warrent to produce original jurisdiction magistrarte

thanks

K.V.S.S PRABHAKAR RAO

ADVOCATE

RAJAHMUNDRY ( A.P)

1 Like

Democratic Indian (n/a)     19 August 2011

 

In interpreting especially the Fundamental Rights, the powers are narrow, rights are broad. Delegated powers are to be interpreted as strictly as possible, consistent with the words, and rights as broadly as possible, with the presumption in favor of the right, and the burden of proof on those claiming a power. In cases of doubt, the presumption is not in favor of a power.


The accused will be produced before the magistrate of the place from where accused is arrested. Constitution is an instrument to put limitations on power of government, it is not about putting limitations on rights of citizens. Since it is a fundamental right to be produced before magistrate within 24 hours, the magistrate that can be reached earliest(the local magistrate where the arrest has taken place) is to be approached. If police claims to take the accused to magistrate far away that will take more time, then burden to justify it lies on the police. Why the accussed should not be produced before the local magistrate of the jurisdiction from where he is arrested? Hence it is clear that Police should produce the accused at the local magistrate under whose jurisdiction the accussed is arrested and get remand order till they reach the jurisdictional magistrate.

 

1 Like

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


Related Threads


Loading