Attempt rape

Dear Mr.Krishnan, 

354 is outraging the modesty of a woman, if anybody uses force to outrage the modesty that is 354, 511 r/w 376 is attempted rape - obviously in rape or attempt thereto modesty is violated - it is just an aggravated form of violation of modesty - penetration is required for rape, for attempt to rape it is important that it should be reflected on teh facts that the person is just about to penetrate if that is reflected it is an attempt to rape. 

As regards FIR - the police is under obligation to record the FIR on the basis of information - at that stage it is not required to go into evidences or witnesses. Polcie cannot refuse to register the FIR

Dear Krishnan,

An attempt to rape is recognized as a misdemeanor offense under the laws of the state[i].  Attempt to rape is also called a specific intent crime in law; it is an offense distinct from rape and assault with intent to rape.  Elements that constitute an offense of attempt to rape are different from the elements that constitute rape and assault with intent to commit rape.

Elements that constitute attempt to rape are:

• there must be an overt act[iii]; and
• there must be an intention to rape when a defendant commits an overt act.

In order to prove an offense of attempt to commit rape there must be commission of an overt act.  Any overt act beyond mere preparation and in furtherance of intent is sufficient and it does not require a last proximate act prior to the consummation of s*xual intercourse.

Generally, there can be no attempt to commit a crime unless the intent to commit it exists at the time when an attempt is made.  Therefore, to constitute an attempt to commit rape upon a female under age of consent, intention to know the girl carnally must have existed in the mind of an accused at the very time when he did an overt act or acts.

Since intention is a state of mind that can be evidenced only by words or conduct of a person who is claimed to have entertained it, specific intent to commit rape like any other fact can be shown by the circumstances[vii].  However, the specific intent to commit rape can be inferred from conduct if such intention follows naturally from the conduct proven.  For instance, when the immediate, direct, and necessary consequences of voluntary acts of an accused points with reasonable certainty to a specific intent to commit rape, intention is established.

Evidence showing an accused person’s voluntary attempt to remove complainant’s clothes to expose his/her private parts would be sufficient to support conviction for attempted rape, even though no further actions were taken to commit an offense of rape.  But it is not mandatory that prosecution must give evidence upon the fact that a defendant touched a victim’s s*xual organs or removed clothing.

Sec 376 does not come into picture in the case of attempt to rape. Its different that police authorities do add the same. However, attempt to rape involves Sec 354, 511 of IPC.

Theres no necessity for having a witness. As per the latest rulings of Apex Court, it is held that a prosecutrix with whom such henious crime has take place won't lie. Now as per Apex Courts ruling even at the time of Evidence it is not necessary to prove the happening of incidence by adducing Medical Evidence. Solitary evidence of the prosecutrix is sufficient enough to prove the guilt.

Thanks.. for your reply

Does limitation act applies to Attempt to rape...