Originally posted by : Ranee....... |
|
How long you stayed together?What problem do you have in marrying her?..if you did not have any problem in getting intimate with her?Did you take price for the help you offered to her? |
|
"economics of arrangments" illustration query
Well it is a very good "innocent" question one and only time I took note of coming from you @ Utpala aka Ranee..... !
It always takes two to Tango. If earlier "pure humane helping grounds" were reason enough to keep fire on your bed rather than at bay with offer of "bread and board" then it should have only limited to non-physical "bread and boarding" social self limits. Knowing well being an adult un-married person living away from your home you yourself indulged with "wide-open eyes" what nature does when two opposite s*xes are supposed to do when bedroom lights are turned off in a rented bed with lure of "bread and board to de raha hu na tumhe!".
Now keeping at same place shola and shabnam culminated in what they were ultimately supposed to end into and when weaker s*x's "emotions" card came into picture inflamed by your earlier “gentlemenly faith trick” you now crying "Sir ji actually I was raped" is no good for a self claimed "humane person" with some self conscience and humaness left in society that we strive to maintain is my view.
A gentleman should maintain his gentleness’ till his end of the bargain. One should not play with emotions of real life abalas.
I also did not like the turn of events that led you to post here. But then law is law which needs absolute proof and nothing else - now daily chant to Lord Hanuman to save you and bless you to become a true gentlemen and not a weak person when next you see a person from opposite s*x. I still think that irrespective what law may say to you, you are still liable to be taken to Court only if the lady has the resources to take you to Court and yes some public reputation damage you may get hit, at the end even if NO CASE is a final verdict.
In this so called query I would not blame only the lady with kid in her then situation. Stronger s*x takes advantage sooner than later over weaker s*x in such situations we see in life in METROS.
Remedy offered:
As a human being you should now do “retroactive justice” to her and the child. That is accept privately the mistakes we single adults from opposite s*x committ in such situation and give her and kid “compensation” so that they are not again on roads from where you picked them and gave them a social pedestal irrespective whether at that time she was still under bonds of legal marriage.
Many readers may comment it is “ludicrous suggestion” from me, but then that is about me on this query what you can comment now! It is better to save two un-safe persons (now a divorced woman with minor child with probably almost no place to go and no faith shoulder to lean on post divorce) than a safe person. That is social justice as per me for this query. CONTROVERSIAL !