Sir,
My Name Kannan
* My Grand Father Sold 3 Ancestral property in the year 1959 for Rs.7700.
* In that sale Registered Document he wrote the reason for sale is to Buy a New Land.
* He have written the same reasion in all three 3 documents.
* In the Year Jan-1962 he buy one Land for Rs 3500 & Next year 1963 One more land for Rs.700 in his name
So both Purchased documents looks like Self earned property
* My father took the Certified Copy of 1959 Sale document & filed a Suit against my Grandfather the Property
Purchased in the year 1962 and 1963 is also ancestral property with the sale amout of 1959 only this property
have been pruchased.
* Suit filed on sub Court in the year 2007
* My grandfather's Cross Examination & Argument also finished.
* This Feb-2012 my grandfather sold the property when the suit is pending & land also destroyed 700 Coconut tree
Lemo 200, Banana 2000 & more valuable trees etc... converted into Plots and the purchased guys also started
selling the plots.
* Now our case also got a suit judgement is dismissed that due to non evidence to prove with that 1959 Amout only
he purchased the property is not acceptable. and after 3 years only he purchased so this is self earned Property
is this correct judgement ?
* What to do next ?
