DV case is not maintainable after 1 year of no cohabitation
What does IT means?
Wife asked maintenance under DV U/S Section 19,20,21,22. Now the case is running 1 and half year.
Is her claiming period is completed or continue?
Kaatu Poochi (Kaatu Poochi&Co) 01 July 2014
DV case is not maintainable after 1 year of no cohabitation
What does IT means?
Wife asked maintenance under DV U/S Section 19,20,21,22. Now the case is running 1 and half year.
Is her claiming period is completed or continue?
Prakash S Thakkar (B.S.L LL.B) 01 July 2014
Prakash S Thakkar (B.S.L LL.B) 01 July 2014
Prakash S Thakkar (B.S.L LL.B) 01 July 2014
Laxmi Kant Joshi (Advocate ) 01 July 2014
sujit kumar (none) 01 July 2014
Dear all,
complaint against me by my out-laws and 498a girl is running in CAW cell. Will this judgement of Hon'ble Dalvi Sir will have any impact on it. No FIR has been registered yet.
Kaatu Poochi (Kaatu Poochi&Co) 01 July 2014
sujit kumar (none) 01 July 2014
Dear all,
complaint against me by my out-laws and 498a girl is running in CAW cell. Will this judgement of Hon'ble Dalvi Sir will have any impact on it. No FIR has been registered yet.
Nadeem Qureshi (Advocate/ nadeemqureshi1@gmail.com) 01 July 2014
rising up again (FFF) 03 July 2014
DEAR learned members...
Can this rule also be applied when both husband ans wife are living under the same roof but in separate room since 6 years ??? they do not talk to each other and no physical contact too. they dont event see each others faces for days. the wife has said this and confirmed under video cameras. Can these video + audio footage be used to show that there is no cohabition for more than 1 year (infact 7 years) and try to get the DV case ruled out ????????????
plz guide...and advice...........
Kaatu Poochi (Kaatu Poochi&Co) 03 July 2014
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate) 03 July 2014
@ Kaatu poochi: The DV case after one year of separation/non cohabitation is noneffective though the court may accept her application and it can be proved before the court during trial that it is certainly an afterthought case to avenge the husband and his parents and relatives over the trivial issues that prevailed when she was in her matrimonial house. I think she is actually abusing the law by misusing the provisions of law in her favor, which if challenged properly, can be defeated. Be in close touch with your advocate regarding the developments of the case.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate) 03 July 2014
@ Rising up again: you could have posted your query in a separate thread, please do it next time, to your question: The burden to prove the allegations no doubt lies on the petitioner under such circumstances but being living under the same roof, it will be difficult for the respondent to prove that there were no contacts between them over years and also to disprove her claims. In your case, the cruelties on her side against you should be substantially established and challenge her allegations properly.