Thank you for the prompt reply.
I can get you all the details of this dispute.
As there was no proper boundary in those days, the boundary was maintained by him in the east and oflate we have understood his encroachment some time back. We were not in a mood to go for a dispute as that was a waste land for us. But now the party goes for pucca construction which may be a trouble in future. Hence, we wanted the rule position before taking up the case. He agrees that his new wall is in our patta land in writing, but claims right beause he owns it for years. Earlier he built a toilet in our side and we never objected keeping the unused portion in mind. Hope that gave him furtherment in this.
Are we in the right side to take up eviction of the party?
Kind regards.