Hi,
There was one case filed by daughter for separate partition and possession of the joint family property by pleading that the property is Joint Hindu Family property and in joint possession for the family after the death of father and court fee paid is Rs 200 under Karnataka court fee act.
- I have filed the IA for insufficient court fee in 2014 for the reason that the scheduled property is not a joint family property. I lost the case (IA) in 2015 with Court conclusion that plaintiff demand is separate possession from her joint family property and the court fee paid is therefore sufficient. and case continued
- In 2016 there was an supreme court judgement that the daughter has no right in the Hindu Undivided Joint Family property if father is not alive.
- I filed another IA based on the judgement and case was in my favour. It is dismissed by the court
Now plaintiff (daughter) filed the RFA in the case that the it was a self-acquired property of her father.
If court fee paid in one section and court fee mater is concluded. What will be the stand of the court? Can HC ask the plaintiff to pay the court fee and continue the case as self-acquired property or it will get dismissed.
Thanks and Regards,
