1. It should proceed as such are summary matters and based on social cause (sari, sindoor and glycerin).
2. But last time Court gave relief to husband this time husband meanwhile if not able to get any favourable Order in his SLP will still agitates and Court will again give long date is what I feel may happen. Reasoning:- It takes a very strong willed PJ / APJ / Ld. Judge to make independent decision when matter seized by SC Court (as he is not bound down in absence of any Stay order transmitted via Registery office to him) you and we all know that (for the records). It is just matter of whose voice is louder making the ld. Judge understand follow the procedure in such cases which is to say 'proceed on S. 125 (3) CrPC' !
3. To avoid that happening if LDOH matter in trial Court (adjourned) was very fresh then suggested to proceed immediately to Sessions Court (now Sessions hearing is on daily basis and since this is summary matter even it can proceed ex part) where wife should summarily agitate and get direction to trial Court to proceed in accordance with law, however this should be done before husband’s SLP comes for hearing before SC and 35 days adjournment period is not lapsed!
All above and previous advice (assume they were oral adduced and are not part of court records) are suggested without prejudice to either party’s rights or no need to know whose side you represent! J
