I have a case on hand pertaining to Domestic Voilence Act, I am appearing for Respondent.
As I read the Act, I found that there is no defence left out for Respondent. The Act has given wide powers for the Magistrate and police alike to deal with the matter unilateraly.
The Act says that mere complaint by the woman is sufficient proof of comitting the voilence.
The women in my case herself is a very arrogant and angry lady having the wrath of the whole members of their family both in her matrimonial house and parental house. It is also said that she had perpetuated the killing of her father through her brother for which her brother had undergone imprisonment.
Under these circumstances I am still perturbed how to protect my client the Respondent in this case.
Any experience or any guidance/light in these type of cases my colleague's could throw upon.
I would be pleased to have.