ALL RETIRED PERSON SHOULD RAISE THEIR VOICE THROUGH "TWITTER", "FACE BOOK" AND OTHER MEDIAS AGAINST THE DISCRIMINATION ON GRATUITY PAYMENT BY THE FINANCE MINISTRY. FINANCE DEPARTMENT HAS PASSED AN ORDER W.E.F. 01.01.06 TO PROVIDE THE BENEFIT TO THEIR OWN EMPLOYEES THOSE WHO ARE NOT RELATED TO ANY PROFIT MAKING INSTITUTION OTHER THAN TO WIN THEIR MIND PRIOR TO ELECTION BUT FOR OTHER EMPLOYEES OF PSU/PVT.SECTOR IT IS 24.05.2010 ON THE PLEA THAT TO REDUCE THE EXPENDITURE OF THE GOVT. PROFIT MAKING ORGANISATIONS ARE NOT INCLUDED WITH THE CHANGE WITHOUT HAVING ANY RATIONALITY
YOU SHOULD TAKE INITIATIVE SO THAT ALL M.P.s in PARLIAMENT AND RAJYASABHA MAY RAISE THE QUESTION " WHY THIS DISCRIMINATION ON THE QUESTION OF GRATUITY PAYMENT FOR EFFECTING THE DATE. I HAVE WRITTEN IN TWITTER AND FACE BOOK ON DIFFERENT OCCASION BUT I LIKE ,YOU SHOULD ALSO PROTEST IN WRITING AS NEXT PARLIAMENTARY SEASON WILL START VERY SHORTLY. PRIYA BRATA CHAKRABARTI - RETIRED OFFICIAL OF SBI AND SBI PENSIONERS ASSOCIATION(BENGAL CIRCLE)
LODGE YOUR PROTEST AGAINST DISCRIMINATORY IMPLEMENTATION OF GRATUITY ACT-2010
DC AHUJA [dcahuja@gmail.com ] has sent the following draft of a letter which can be used for lodging the protest against the discriminatory implementation of Gratuity Act 2010.
All those bankers who have been affected by non implementation of the Act from back date, should send the letter on the following lines to all the authorities separately. These bankers should also contact the union leaders and ask them to send the letters on their letter pads to these authorities. The central union leadership should also follow up with the government as this has been a major loss to a large number of bankers who have recently retired.
To,
The Hon’ble President of India,
President House,
New Delhi-110001.
The Hon’ble Chief Justice of India
Supreme Court of India,
New Delhi.
The Hon’ble Prime Minister of India,
Central Secreteriate,
New Delhi-110001. .
New Delhi-110001.
The Hon’ble Labour Minister,
Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi-110001
11th JUNE.,2010.
Respected Madam / Sir,
PROTEST AGAINST THE DISCRIMINATORY IMPLEMENTATION OF GRATUITY ACT, 2010 w.e.f. 24TH MAY, 2010 FOR PSU/BANKS/ INSURANCE SECTORS. (GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES HAVE GOT THE SAME w.e.f.01-01-2006)
We are thankful to Government for amending the Gratuity Act, 2010 effective from 24thMay, 2010. The Gratuity Act amendment 2010 is for Private Sectors / Banks / Insurance and Public Sector Undertaking, whereas the Government has amended the Gratuity Act in August 2009 for Central Govt. Employees effective from 01-01-2006.
As per the Fundamental Rights mentioned in our Constitution RIGHT TO EQUALITY article 14 guarantees equality before law as well as equal protection of the Law to all persons within the territory of India. This includes the equal subjection of all persons to the authority of law, as well as equal treatment of persons in similar circumstances.
As per the Fundamental Rights described in our Constitution RIGHT TO FREEDOM article 21 extend the protection that any law laying down a procedure must be just, fair and reasonable.
On going through the above articles of Fundamental Right in our Constitution we presume that it is a great injustice with the employees of Private Sectors / PSU / BANKS / INSURANCE SECTORS as the date of implementation of Gratuity Act is w.e.f. 24thMay,2010. The Government implemented the 6th Pay Commission in the year 2008 and amended the Gratuity Bill for Central Government Employees in August 2009 effectivefrom 1st Jan., 2006. Another Gratuity Act amended in May 2010 for Private Sectors / PSU / BANKS / INSURANCE Sectors effective from 24th May, 2010.
It took Government more than two years, after implementation of 6th Pay Commission, to move the Gratuity Bill before the Parliamentary Committee and then get the bill passed in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. The bill was moved only when most of the Trade Unions met the Hon’ble Labour Minister from time to time, whereas it would have been moved in the year 2008 itself after implementation of the 6th Pay Commission..
We all know that Private Sectors / PSU / BANKS / INSURANCE Sectors are earning profits and are the back bone of the Country. Then why there is discrimination between Central Government Employees and the employees of Private/ PSU / BANKS / INSURANCE Sectors. All these sectors stand strongly during the recession in the world.
Is this not a great INJUSTICE ? Is this not INEQUALITY as per the Fundamental Rights mentioned in our CONSITUTION ?
We once again request The Hon’ble President of India, The Hoin’ble Chief Justice ofIndia, The Hon’ble Prime Minister of India, The Hon’ble Labour Minister of India, to consider our genuine demand being the RIGHT OF EQUALITY as mentioned in our Constitution and amend the date of implementation of Gratuity effective from 01-01- 2006 instead of 24th May, 2010.
Thanking you in anticipation.
Yours faithfully,
( )
Retired from :…………………..
Date of Retirement :……………
CC: To the Secretary General, Committee on Petitions, Rajya Sabha, New Delhi-110001,
with a request to redress our genuine demand under article 350 of the Constitution
of India.
APPEAL BY Dr. G. Sanjeeva Reddy, MP, FOR EXTENDING THE BENEFITS OF ENHANCED GRATUITY TO THOSE WHO RETIRED BETWEEN 2006 AND 2010
The Indian Worker
Founder Managing Editor Editor
HARIHARNATH SHASTRI Dr.G.SANJEEVA REDDY, MP P.J.RAJU
June, 01-15,2010
Dr. G. Sanjeeva Reddy in his speech in Parliament urged the government to implement the amended Gratuity Act with retrospective effect
Sir, the Minister has proposed some amendments to the Gratuity Act. We welcome them and support this Bill. But we have some suggestions to make. The sixth Central Pay commission has recommended gratuity of ten lakhs rupees to the Central Government employees with retrospective effect. The same provision is adopted here in the Gratuity Act also but it is not being done with retrospective effect. This means workers who have retired during the period from 2006 to 2010 are denied the benefit. All the recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission have been implemented and gratuity has been paid to employees with retrospective effect whereas in this case, if the private employers are going to give these benefits in this manner, who is going to benefit? It is not going to be taxed on public sectorcompanies. It is for the benefit of the private sector employees. If implemented with retrospective effect, this would benefit people who retired from 2006 onwards otherwise the employees who retired before this Bill would get only Rs. 3,50,000.
Sir, the Bill says that it shall come into force on such date as the central government notify in the Gazette. So, it is really depriving workers of their genuine right. I can submit to the hon. Minister to please reconsider this. After passing the Gratuity Bill in 1972 the amount of gratuity of Rupees three lakhs and fifty thousand was fixed by amendment in 1997.
You have not changed the quantum. Every worker is entitled to have gratuity at the rate of 15 days wages only for every completed year of service. For quite a long time, this 15-days entitlement is there. We thought that the Government is considering favourably increasing this 15-days wages to 30 days. It has been the demand of all the trade unions. Since the cost of living is very high and the prices are soaring high, the quantum of 15 days wages should be increased to 30 days. But that has not been done. Only the big entrepreneurs are going to get the benefit, not the working class. You are denying this right to employees who are working in the private sector. It is the grave injustice to these employees. I am sure that the Hon. Labour Minister can understand the feeling of the working class. Poor workers should not be denied their right. Another point is that, Sir, gratuity is given in lieu of service rendered to the industry. For thirty or forty years workers render service to the industry and thatindustry has to pay gratuity to workers because workers are not entitled to pension at this moment. A large number of workers do not get any pension. They get only gratuity benefit on retirement. Today neither you are increasing the quantum of gratuity entitlement nor implementing it with retrospective effect. It is really a grave injustice to workers. I can only request that our Government should reconsider this matter. Therefore, I request the hon. Minister to consider it with retrospective effect. If it is not passed with retrospective effect, it will be an injustice to the working class. I once again appeal to the Government to please reconsider it otherwise working class may start agitation saying that you are discriminating between the Government employees and private sector employees and you are bringing this Act without retrospective effect only to benefit the private employers. It is not good for the prestige of the Government. Therefore, I appeal to the hon. Minister to reconsider this. There are no financial consequences on the Government and there is no excess burden on the Government. There is burden only on the private sector. Therefore, I earnestly request the hon. Minister to please reconsider this small thing. This is a social security benefit that you have to give. Nothing else can compensate the workers for their long service to the industry.
Publish by
Subhash S.Sawant
General Secretary
Indian National Bank Employees Federation