LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Amita   12 January 2017

Help pls : question re: appeal before the high court

Hello, I need help on a High Court (HC) matter. The wife moved a Miscellaneous application before the Family Court, which was eventually rejected. Now she has challenged this rejection at the HC.

However, the wife tried to play a dirty tactic here. She took permission from the HC that she’ll serve the Notice to the respondent husband directly (Direct Service, or DS). However, she never did, and instead filed an Affidavit before the HC that the husband had refused to accept the said notice. The refusal was treated as “Notice Served”.

Fortunately, the husband came to know about this a few months later and appeared in person before the HC. Not much had happened during the proceedings yet. Now the husband intends to submit a merit-based detailed response and also wants to move a separate petition for the HC to perform an inquiry into the wife’s conduct (as well as the maintainability of this petition) as it relates to the Service of the Notice (this includes the wife’s sworn Affidavit before the HC that she tried to serve it to her husband, which is a lie) as it’s a clear Abuse of the Process of Law.

Questions:

  1. Since the wife has challenged the order of the Family Court before the HC, her petition would be legally called an “Appeal”. Correct?
  2. Can such a petition be filed under the umbrella of the current case/Appeal pending before the HC?
  3. If yes, under which legal provision? That is, what should be the legal ground (e.g. Article Number, CPC rule, etc.) that would go in along with such a petition?

Thanks for your help.

Amita

 



Learning

 3 Replies


(Guest)
Originally posted by : Amita
Hello, I need help on a High Court (HC) matter. The wife moved a Miscellaneous application before the Family Court, which was eventually rejected. Now she has challenged this rejection at the HC.

However, the wife tried to play a dirty tactic here. She took permission from the HC that she’ll serve the Notice to the respondent husband directly (Direct Service, or DS). However, she never did, and instead filed an Affidavit before the HC that the husband had refused to accept the said notice. The refusal was treated as “Notice Served”.

Fortunately, the husband came to know about this a few months later and appeared in person before the HC. Not much had happened during the proceedings yet. Now the husband intends to submit a merit-based detailed response and also wants to move a separate petition for the HC to perform an inquiry into the wife’s conduct (as well as the maintainability of this petition) as it relates to the Service of the Notice (this includes the wife’s sworn Affidavit before the HC that she tried to serve it to her husband, which is a lie) as it’s a clear Abuse of the Process of Law.

Questions:


Since the wife has challenged the order of the Family Court before the HC, her petition would be legally called an “Appeal”. Correct?
Can such a petition be filed under the umbrella of the current case/Appeal pending before the HC?
If yes, under which legal provision? That is, what should be the legal ground (e.g. Article Number, CPC rule, etc.) that would go in along with such a petition?


Thanks for your help.

Amita

 

What did your wife ask in the miscellaneous petition?

That you have not stated.

 

Without that information, nothing can be advised.

Amita   13 January 2017

Oops. Sorry. The Miscellaneous petition was for the minor daughter's passport renewal. The daughter is a US citizen and so her passport renewal requires both parents' consent or a court order allowing the mother to get it renewed (without the father's consent). The daughter's custody case  is already going on, and the wife might take the child out of India if this passport renewal is allowed which is why the father is opposing this. The child has been in India for years as her parents.

Now that the application was rejected by the Family Court, the wife has approached the HC.

Thanks

 

 

Amita   14 January 2017

That'd be CPC. Correct?

Thank you, sir


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register