Husbands illicit affair is Cruelty u/s 498a

Very true,

HAd it not been the case, even hubbies would have got some respite from the false cases in so many years. Even those who finally do get respite are those who learnt law after much struggle and started raising their voice against the harassmnet that they are facing.

hshahahahhahahahahhahahahahhah

good question

26 May 2011, 18:34   Kushan Vyas Advocate [ Scorecard : 3110] Thank the Contributor Send PM   @Meenal Bhadur   Kushan,ye news post karne ke baad aap itne duble kaise ho gaye?   Answer: Aap mote ho gaye aur me dubla ho gaya tention me.

ever........best answer

Aaj kal 498a ka poora durupyog ho raha hia,

ye judgment uska sateek udharan hai!

As soon as a case under IPC 498A or DV Act is introduced a batch of MCP's and FCP's descent and start fighting. No one has the mind to think about the other aspects the case.

1. What about Ujjwala, is she any way responsible for the death of Chandrakala? She cannot perhaps be punished under 498A. Or can she? As she was staying with the accused as a mistress can she not be treated as a woman relative of the accused for the purpose of 498A?

2. In any case she was equally responsible for the death of Chandrakala. Why was she not hauled up for abetment of suicide.

3. Ujjwala cannot be punished for two-directional adultery beacuae Article 15(3) of the Constitution is said to protect her.

Correct Dr. Ramani...If the man is to be punished, so is his mistress for being accomplice in crime as the crime here would be actually incomplete without Ujjwala.

Here, Ujjwala should have been treated as a female relative abetting suicide of the wife. Even if law has excluded hubby's mistress from being a party in 498A, she (ujjwala) should still have been convicted under SECTION 306. So this makes me wonder why it is so easy for them to punish hubby's siblings and parents for anything that happens between a couple.