LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Raj Kumar Makkad (Adv P & H High Court Chandigarh)     16 March 2010

JUST TEACHING

There is something hollow at the heart of education in India. It has been a long time, almost 10 years in fact, since the Supreme Court outlawed corporal punishment in schools. That was the first step, after a series of complaints about the injury and even death of children caused by punishment in schools made such a declaration inevitable. No remarkable change was noticed in the following years, except perhaps in the district of Idukki in Kerala which organized its institutions in 2008 with the aim of wiping out corporal punishment in schools within one year. Most other states, among them West Bengal, made a few noises and slacked off, even neglecting to notify schools of the Supreme Court's statement. A report indicated that 85 per cent of children who got beaten up or physically punished in some other way went to government schools in the state. Now the Calcutta High Court has ruled that if a child dies as a result of physical punishment, the teacher responsible should be charged with murder, and not with negligence or culpable homicide not amounting to murder, as is the convention.

 

The logic behind the court's ruling is clear: no teacher who causes the death of a child can be let off with just two years' imprisonment. The ruling is also a way of emphasizing the gravity of the crime — apparently even that is needed — and of creating a deterrent. What is astounding, however, is that the courts alone seem bothered about how teachers treat children in schools. Is this the courts' job? Yet the most disturbing questions can be raised about the level of education of the educators: who are these teachers who continue with their violence unashamed? The system that produces and assesses them and lets them pass needs to be examined first. Something has gone terribly wrong in the concept of teaching; otherwise state governments, child welfare boards, local administrations and school management committees would not have remained so apathetic about ensuring the limits of punishment. A country in which a court actually has to announce that teachers who kill children should be charged with nothing less than murder cannot be said to have emerged from barbaric darkness. The recent talk of children's rights is nothing more than a fashionable tic. Rights have to do with civilization and humanity. Adults who casually hurt the small and the powerless can have no inkling of either.

 



Learning

 2 Replies

Arup Kumar Gupta, Korba, Chattishgarh ((m)9893058429)     16 March 2010

mr makkad, you raised a very serious point.

in my opinion the court done a thanked job, which ought to be done. nobody has the right to kill the students.

but the actual problem lies eleswhere whicd deserves to be discussedin the forum. before going to the depth i like to put an incident of korba, cg. a student commited sucide of dav school of kusmunda, korba cg. the concerned headmistress is now suspended. the student was not allowed to appear in the final examination due to the lack of required  presence at school. he felt so hurt by this incident that she commited sucide. the concerned headmistress who took active and strong part in the matter, was suspended,- as a result of public grivences. but i personally feel that the teacher was innocent. and did her duty according to the expections of gurdians.

we the gurdians in one side put pressure upon the teacher and students to give a best result in one side and in another side we failed to create  an enviournment at schools and at home by which one can give his/her best performance at exams. but we are also not sole responsible for it, because we are also getting pressure for these, as because, we have to keep the interest of our children. the matter best described in the film 'three idots'. according to me the three idots are , the gurdian, the school management and the state and central goverment combinedly - who do not know what to do and what not.

Kanaksinh P.Boda (Educationist/Lawyer)     17 March 2010

Was in education field for over 35 years. The Educational Institutes are mostly manged by Political Leaders, who are using them as back door entry to remain in politics. The Institutions often become vicitm to political rivalry. The Institutions also serve to these leaders as back home domains for sarisfying their ego when they are out of power. The institutions are also vandalised frequently by local goons/aspiring political leaders to gain cheap mileage. I think there is hardly any power left with the people called teachers who are actually running the show. For example, take the recent incident of suspension of the Registrar of University of Mumbai, Dr.Venkarramani. He has become a scape goat of  too much of Unionism in education field. There are many more incidents to quote. Till the Educational Institutions are handed over to the safe hands who are purely interested in education and nothing esle,  law by itself will not be ablse to cure.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register