can we back the lost land in kul kayda act.......plz give me details
Gandhi Sachin Subhashlal (self employed) 07 May 2012
can we back the lost land in kul kayda act.......plz give me details
NITIN (OFFICER) 25 June 2012
Dear sir / Madam,
Can Anyone suggest me any book which content the information about KULKAYADA in Marathi Language.
I will greatful if anyone provide me Books name with its Author & Publication name.
Thanks in advance.
Nitin
Chetan Tirwadi (Director) 06 October 2012
Hello Sir,
I am from Maharashtr in Ahmednagar District.
I want to purchase of land having Niyantrit Satta Prakar Kul Kayada 43 atis patra of 33 guntha. But the problem is From Whom i want to purcahse this land he can't take permission form Collector before he purchasing this land. That why the Tahasildar Said it has "Shart Bhang" and land goes to Govt.
Please Provide me the Solution for Purchasing this Land.
Pelase give me right way how i purchase this land.
Thanks
Chetan
Chetan Tirwadi (Director) 08 October 2012
Hello, I am from Maharashtr in Ahmednagar District. I want to purchase of land having "Niyantrit Satta Prakar Kul Kayada 43 atis patra" of 33 guntha. But the problem is From Whom i want to purcahse this land he can't take permission form Collector before he purchasing this land. That why the Tahasildar Said it has "Shart Bhang" and land goes to Govt. Please Provide me the Solution for Purchasing this Land. Pelase give me right way how i purchase this land. Thanks
bhagwat patil (Property due diligence 9422773303) 12 October 2012
chetan (Accountant) 05 November 2012
Hi,
One of my friend said that if a person has over 1 acre of land, he can not claim a land under kul kayda. Is this true as one of our land is under this rule and the kul has land in access of over 4 to 5 acres. Kindly advice.
S Jadhav 98336 98330 (Jadhav & Associates) 05 November 2012
If there is a pencil mark then it indicates that it is not verified and made permanent. You can write to the Tahsildar and request that the mark be removed. In this case, the persons climing that they are kul have to provide proof of how they became kul.
chetan (Accountant) 05 November 2012
Sorry sir, i have not understood what do you mean by pencil mark. Can you please explain in detail about this.
The talathi is from the same village and supports the villagers more than us.
The kul has been since nearly 35 years from 1975. They do not grow anything on the land and only grass grows on it. They had asked this land from my grandfather land for their cattle to graze. And once my grandfather expired, they put their name in the kul section. Also, is there a law if they are official kul, they should pay us money at the end of each year for cultivating the land which they are using? And we have no proof neither do they have any proof.
Sir, kindly advice what is best that can be done in this.
S Jadhav 98336 98330 (Jadhav & Associates) 12 November 2012
Kul Kayada was made applicable from the Tillers' Day i.e. 1-4 1957.
Whenever a person requests that the land records should mention his name under any right, he has to apply to the talathi with the requisite documents. The talthi will make the entry in pencil and forward the papers to the higher authorities who can approve or disapprove the claim.
The pencil entries are to be removed after the disapproval is received from the concerned higher authorities. Many times this approval or disapproval is not received and hence the pencil entries are neither erased nor confirmed by marking it in pen (instead of pencil). Hence there are pencil entries.
If the entries ar enot confirmed after a long time by the appropriate authorities, the owner can apply to the talathi for removal of these entries which the talathi has to do since he has not received the approval from the higher authorities within the time required.
So please apply to the talathi to remove the pencil entries as it has been long time since they are there.
Hope this clarifies.
S Jadhav
taufik hasson ahemad khan (farmer) 19 April 2013
my grandparents had got a huge piece of land (inam) in kokan Maharashtra from government in old days 1952 . i have an abolition latter of Mumbai high court . And also have my grandfather’s death certificate. On that basis we put our name on many 7/12 . (more then 15 7/12) . and in most of 7/12 there is no name of my grandfather . talathi and some people had sold it illegally .due to poority in old days my grandfather had taken some amount (bojha) from people . and i found their names on 7/12 as owner . And some of kul like them are also now owner of land which we saw in 2009 as kul and they sold their land with the help of talathi and tehsildaar . talathi not showing papers to us and not giving fresh 7/12 too. I would like to know –
1. in inam land kul kayeda works ?
2. Can Kul sold land without our permission?
3. Does 'Inaam' land fall under Kul kayda ?
4. The 'Kul' has got the land transferred in their name in 2007 without our notice under '32G'. Is it legal and valid.
5. Later 'KUL' has sold the land in 2008.
6. Can we recover the land in this case ...
7. How can I get my whole land back?
8. What documents required to file a case for this.
bhagwat patil (Property due diligence 9422773303) 10 June 2013
mkk (md) 23 June 2013
Hello Mr Patil Sir
We are planning to Buy 32G and Sec 43 land in Thane.Please tell us the procedure to buy.
I mean we have done sathe karar with the farmer/kul and he has his name on 7/12.
we cannot do conveyance unless 32g/sec 43 gets removed.
So please tell us how to remove the sec 43 or whom to approach /wats the department procedure for the same and how much times does it takes.
Thanks & Regards
MKK
MANOJ SANKHE (student) 05 July 2013
HI KISHORE
AS PER UR QUERY SOME POINTS ARE HERE TO ADVISE
1) ANY ACT NEVER ALLOWS ANY FARMER TO GET ' BHUMIHIN'
2) 'VARKAS' DOSE NOT ATTRACT TENANCY ACT. TENANCY ACT ATTRACTS ACTUAL LAND OF CULTIVATED AREA.
3) TENANCY ACT ACTS DIFFRENT WITH SHEDULED TRIBE AND OTHER CASTS TENANT.
YOU GO THROUGH SEARCH OF UR LAND DOCCUMENT FROM 1950 7/12 EXTRACTS AND MUTATION RELATING.
YOU WILL DEFINATELY GET BACK SOME OF UR LAND AFTER HUGE STRUGGLE AND HESITATION.
KEEP PATIENCE AND GO AHEAD MY CONTACT IS 9422489529
taufik hasson ahemad khan (farmer) 16 August 2013
Abhijit (none) 12 September 2013
Hi,
I have a land of 2 acres which is with kul kayada 43. I want to remove this 43 from 7/12. I have applied for that and Tahsildar is saying that my case is having shart bhang and need to do 84 - C case to get the shart sh*thil of that land. The land history is below :
My grandfather has got that land as kul of that land . He was kul before 1953. In 1953 he has sold that land to some X person. In 1963 the person X has also registers himself as Kul by paying some fees. In 1971 My grandfather has re-purchased(by reconveyance deed) it back. Now Tahsildar is saying that at the time of reconveyance your grandfather has not taken the permission of collector(shart sh*thil keli nahi). So it is case of shart bhang and need to be handled under 84-C . We have the possation of land since 1971. We have that piece of land only.
Now I have following questions:
1) Is my case is a shart bhang case
2) what is the law says in case if I need to do 84-C.
3) what will be the risks I will be facing here in this case.