Mayank Sharma 01 December 2018
Adv Deepak Joshi +917017821512 (Advocate) 01 December 2018
As your marriage itself is void, she is not eligible.
Varun Singla 02 December 2018
Mayank Sharma 02 December 2018
Sachin (N.A) 02 December 2018
Yes, till the pendency of the case , she has right to claim interim maintence,
Mayank Sharma 02 December 2018
Sachin (N.A) 02 December 2018
Originally posted by : Mayank Sharma | ||
@sachin if the case goes in my favour then wll court order for recovery ?? * Its all about section 11 the decision of this case decideds that she is my wife or not |
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ramesh Chandra Rampratapji Daga Vs. Rameshwari Ramesh Chandra Daga has been pleased to lay down that the maintenance is payable even to the wife in a proceeding under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
There is no provision of recovery of maintence once paid.
Mayank Sharma 02 December 2018
Sachin (N.A) 02 December 2018
I understand the case is different, the basic question was whether she can claim interim maintence or not. The answer is "YES"
Mayank Sharma 02 December 2018
Kumar Doab (FIN) 02 December 2018
GO thru, carefully;
The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
24 Maintenance pendente lite and expenses of proceedings. Where in any proceeding under this Act it appears to the court that either the wife or the husband, as the case may be, has no independent income sufficient for her or his support and the necessary expenses of the proceeding, it may, on the application of the wife or the husband, order the respondent to pay to the petitioner the expenses of the proceeding, and monthly during the proceeding such sum as, having regard to the petitioner's own income and the income of the respondent, it may seem to the court to be reasonable
(i) During the pendency of the divorce proceedings at any point of time if the wife establishes that she has no sufficient independent income for her support, it is open to her to claim maintenance pendente lite
and then
25 Permanent alimony and maintenance .
Since the provision exist by Sec;24 the court can decide.
If you have the evidence of income by spouse then you can appraise the court.
Kumar Doab (FIN) 02 December 2018
For permanent and periodic maintenance
`Wife' or `Husband' ; Words should be liberally construed and wife or husband under void or voidable marriage may be entitled to claim maintenance under Section 25(1) of the Act.
The Apex Court has decided and citation is already posted above i.e.
Supreme Court of India
Rameshchandra Rampratapji Daga vs Rameshwari Rameshchandra Daga on 13 December, 2004
Author: Dharmadhikari
Bench: D. M. Dharmadhikari, H. K. Sema
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 1774-1775 of 1775
Kumar Doab (FIN) 02 December 2018
For permanent and periodic maintenance
Go thru; Sec25
`Wife' or `Husband' ; Words should be liberally construed and wife or husband under void or voidable marriage may be entitled to claim maintenance under Section 25(1) of the Act.
The Apex Court has decided and citation is already posted above i.e.
Supreme Court of India
Rameshchandra Rampratapji Daga vs Rameshwari Rameshchandra Daga on 13 December, 2004
Author: Dharmadhikari
Bench: D. M. Dharmadhikari, H. K. Sema
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 1774-1775 of 1775
Kumar Doab (FIN) 02 December 2018
To pick up relevant points from various prespectives, be properly informed and to have 1st hand feel of the views of courts and Presiding Officers GO thru;
Rajasthan High Court
Madan vs The State Of Rajasthan And Anr. on 28 August, 1992
Equivalent citations: I (1993) DMC 71, 1992 WLN UC 322
Author: N Tibrewal
Bench: N Tibrewal
7. The marriage may be void, voidable or valid. In case of void marriage, it is void ab initio, but, in a case of voidable marriage, it stands annulled from the date of the decree of nullity which can be passed Under Section 12 of the Act on any of the grounds enumerated therein. If the' marriage is valid, then, the marriage can be dissolved on the petition by the husband or the wife on any of the grounds mentioned Under Section 13 of the Act.
9. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the wife that a term 'wife' in Section 125 Cr. P.C. should be given a wider meaning so as to include therein not only a lawfully wedded wife but also a woman married in fact. It was also contended, that in any case, the marriage in the instant case was not void ab initio and the wife and the non-petitioner may be treated as a divorcee even after the marriage was declared void Under Section 12 of the Act by a decree of nullity. If a divorcee is held to be entitled to the benefits of the section, the wife in the instant case should also be brought under the purview to be entitled to maintenance Under Section 125 Cr. P.C. In my view, this argument cannot be accepted. The right of the wife to maintenance depends upon the continuance of her marriage status and once the status of husband and wife is declared to be null and void, the effect would be the same as in (he case of void marriage Under Section 11 of the Act.
10. The next question that may arise is from what date the order of cancellation should be effective.
Wife under a void or voidable marriage is also entitled to maintenance and alimony under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955..
Kumar Doab (FIN) 02 December 2018
And
Delhi High Court
Kuldip Chand Sharma vs Geeta Sharma on 25 February, 1976
Equivalent citations: AIR 1977 Delhi 124, ILR 1976 Delhi 854
Author: B Misra
Bench: B Misra
14… At the present time nobody can be expected to live and make his or her two ends meet on this paltry sum. The court below awarded the amount in view of "potentiality of the respondent to earn" and so she was indeed expected to earn and maintain herself, if she were not to be left to starve to death. The appellant can, therefore, not derive any advantage from the alleged earning of the respondent after he has had the alimony fixed at a low figure. The finding of the court below is affirmed and the contention of the appellant is rejected.
Ilustrated Allahabad High Court judgment to defeat the claim of OP;
Smt.Kiran Dhar vs Alok Berman on 14 May, 2014
Bench: Arvind Kumar (Ii)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
AFR
Reserved
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 623 of 2007
7. Learned counsel for the opposite party argued that second marriage is void ab initio on the ground of subsistence of first marriage, then this wife is not entitled for maintenance as marriage is void.
29. In view of Sections 5 (1) and 11 of Hindu Marriage Act and also in view of decision of Apex Court in Yamunabai Anantrao Adhav v. Anantrao Shivram Adhav and another (supra) the marriage between Smt. Kiran Dhar and Alok Berman is void ab initio, and she is not entitled to maintenance.
30. It is also clear from the decision of Yamunabai Anantrao Adhav v. Anantrao Shivram Adhav and another (supra) that even if the second wife (Smt. Kiran Dhar) was not aware of first marriage of her husband with another woman, she is not entitled to any maintenance.
31. In view of the above discussions, this criminal revision is liable to fail, and is hereby dismissed.
Order Date :- 14.5.2014 Anupam (Justice Arvind Kumar Tripathi - II)
Revisionist :- Smt. Kiran Dhar
Opposite Party :- Alok Berman