parties agreed for the divorce during mediation by accepting 1500000/- raising no objection or unsettled issues in the agreement , now at the time of executin of agreement at familiy court she is asking for stridhan. kindly help
dhirendra pateria (law officer) 14 July 2012
parties agreed for the divorce during mediation by accepting 1500000/- raising no objection or unsettled issues in the agreement , now at the time of executin of agreement at familiy court she is asking for stridhan. kindly help
Anish Thakur 7018812737 (advocate) 14 July 2012
dear pateria,
if the agreement is mentioning that there will be no issue after4 this settlement still stridhan is such a ground which can not be deny at any circumstance however you can take defence that stridhan is paid back with this money or something like such that she had taken stridhan back with her many times ago when she had left her matrimonial home etc.
dhirendra pateria (law officer) 14 July 2012
sir, the matter was referred to mediation for settling the disputes how can she not raise this such issue if it was in her mind if after pay such a huge amount i am not getting the divorce the purpose of mediation is defeted -seniors pl comment
rajiv_lodha (zz) 15 July 2012
Originally posted by : dhirendra pateria | ||
sir, the matter was referred to mediation for settling the disputes how can she not raise this such issue if it was in her mind if after pay such a huge amount i am not getting the divorce the purpose of mediation is defeted -seniors pl comment |
If the MCD draft has not covered this particular issue, tjis snake may raise its head very well. She is harassing u+ delay tact
dhirendra pateria (law officer) 20 July 2012
now the decree of divorce has been passed on the basis of settlement agreement still can she challenge her dismissal of section 27 application ?
is the appeal agains the order passed on the bass of settlement agreement lies?