With great respect.
complaint filed u/s 138 through a bank branch manager, now it is coming for trial , the said complainant is transferred to another branch , so what is exact provision for substitute the complainant
samanchi srini vas (member) 15 October 2010
With great respect.
complaint filed u/s 138 through a bank branch manager, now it is coming for trial , the said complainant is transferred to another branch , so what is exact provision for substitute the complainant
PJANARDHANA REDDY (ADVOCATE & DIRECTOR) 15 October 2010
without court leave complaint cannot change as they wish
DEEPAK ASSOCIATES (08010117611) 15 October 2010
The Bank is a jurist person, hence make an application to the court to subsitute the complainant and will be allowed
R.Ramachandran (Advocate) 15 October 2010
A couple of days back, a similar question was answered as under:
InAssociated Cement Co. Ltd.Vs. Keshvanand (Criminal Appeal No. 1239 of 1997, Decided On: 16.12.1997), the Hon’ble Supreme Court (in paragraph 25 of the decision) has held as under:
"we suggest as a pragmatic proposition that no magistrate shall insist that the particular person, whose statement was taken on oath at the first instance, alone can continue to represent the company till the end of the proceedings. There e may be occasions when a different person can represent the company e.g. the particular person who represents the company at the first instance may either retire for, the company's service or may otherwise cease to associate therewith or he would be transferred to a distant place. In such cases it would be practically difficult for the company to continue to make the same person represent the company in the court . In any such eventuality it is open to the de jure complainant company to seek permission of the court for sending any other person to represent the company in the court.."
Ravikant Soni (LAWYER IN JAIPUR) 16 October 2010
U/S 302 of Cr.PC.
302. Permission to conduct prosecution.-
(1) Any Magistrate inquiring into or trying a case may permit the prosecution to be conducted by any person other than a police officer below the rank of inspector, but no person, other than the Advocate-General, or Government Advocate or a Public Prosecutor or Assistant Public Prosecutor, shall be entitled to do so without such permission:
Provided that no police officer shall be permitted to conductthe prosecution if he has taken part in the investigation into the offence with respect to which the accused is being prosecuted.
(2) Any person conducting the prosecution may do so personally or by a pleader.