Null and void

Firstly the provisions of the Hindu Marriage are not applicable to you as the Hindu Marriage Act only applies to Hindu.  Unless and until your wife had converted at the time of marriage, you cannot file under HMA. 

There are grounds on which a null and void Petition can be filed.  If you have filed on the ground of fraud or misrepresentation then there is a limitation of one year from the date of discovery of the fraud. 

Yes, the delay and cohabitation between the couple since the discovery of the fraud can validate an invalid marriage. 

You need to elaborate more on the facts of the case. 

You should have filed a Petition under the Specific Relief Act. 

Have not you asked your lawyer under which specific section of which Act he considered the marriage as invalid?

If you see the married couples in the whole world, almost all of them feel incompatible on one or the other reason. Only a very few go to the court, who themselves are not capable of creating mutual trust in between them.

You have not answered my question, "Have not you asked your lawyer under which specific section of which Act he considered the marriage as invalid, as your question was about invalidity of your marriage/"

Do you have any specific reason to believe that your marriage is null & void? If the reason is "Hindu n non Hindu married under Hindu marriage act," which section of the Hindu Maariage you have quoted in in your petition in support of your contention?

Originally posted by : rajesh
	Shall explain again... Hindu marriage act applicable only for Hindu spouses... If any partner/spouse Is a non Hindu, the marriage has to be registered under special marriage act.... Which I have not registered... There are lots of judgements in the journal... I'm not an advocate like you to talk about sections.... I hope u can map it to some sections

I have asked for SPECIFIC SECTION of the Hindu Marriages Act under which you believe your marriage to be null & void and the relief sought under the provision of that section, NOT the ACT as a whole.

If you don't reply the questions of the experts suitably, how you can expect any appropriate solution to your problem, if you really face any? Earlier also, you have evaded to reply to the question of Mr. JIGYASU, as asked by him two days back. If you are not an advocate, what was your hitch in asking question from your own lawyer, as Mr. JIGYASU pointed out and why not revealing here what he advised you on that aspect?