LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Nishikant (nishikant.bansode@gmail.com)     26 February 2011

Order VI Rule 17 or CPC

 

Atmaram & Sakharam are the defendants in the suit filed by their brother Tukaram for declaration  that sale deed between Atmaram & Sakharam and one Vijay Jadhav in respect of the part of his ancestral property is not binding upon him & for partition . After filing WS, defendants now want to seek an amendment in written statement & want to insert a paragraph about the gift deed executed by defendant’s mother to the defendant’s prior to institution of suit.

 

Ref: Order VI Rule 17 or CPC                We have to Defend this case



Learning

 3 Replies

G. ARAVINTHAN (Legal Consultant / Solicitor)     27 February 2011

Why amending.. Better to file additional written statement under Order VIII Rule 9

adv. rajeev ( rajoo ) (practicing advocate)     27 February 2011

In my opinion instead of going for additional WS it is better to get amend the WS.

DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g (POWER OF DEFENSE IS IMMENSE )     27 February 2011

Pl tell the defference of amendment and additional WS.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register