There are other clauses that if the employee is not in employment at the time of disbursement, or is serving notice period at the time of disbursement, he shall be in eligible for payout, even if the employee has performed/achieved set parameters and has been in service during the defined period of contests etc. While the company derives current and future benefit from the efforts of employee. The HR point of view is that company formulates such plans to derive enhanced performance in future also and if the employee separates after getting the payment there is inadequate return on the investment i.e. performance linked bonus/incentive.
The question arises who is at loss and who gains: obviously employee and employer respectively. It is high time that employee start becoming firm on getting adequate and excellent fixed pay and reject performance linked pay. It is also high time that employees unite at all levels and thwart selfish and self centered demands of employer.
Then there are other issues of FNF settlement, PF, gratuity, relieving letter, reference check, bonds, service agreements etc…There must be a scrutiny of such cases for each company and each employee must start logging the grievances and complaints and highlight such employers.
Look at the cost and hardships involved in getting educated, experienced and be ready to earn ands support the family.
Performers have been and shall remain in demand.
Some of the senior managers have frankly admitted that they have organized themselves in such a manner that attrition dose not affect them and employees who have worked with them flock back to them.
They follow some good mantras:
Going the Extra Mile
L E A D E R S H I P E S S E N T I A L S
The road ahead:Effective strategy is essential to the success of a company . It’s the process senior executives
use to think about how the business will win in the future. But how good your strategy is- it will
fail if people don’t understand it.