As the lawyer
1)misrepresented and suppressed facts and
2) did not file chief affidavit
3) did not allow the defendent to appear in the court
4) exempted witnesses on the plaintiff from cross examination
the subcourt did not get a proper view of the money suit case instituted by a Bank and hence the court decreed the case against me by allowing the petition of the Bank to recover the outstanding Balance as claimed by the Bank from my locked out and defunct company and the directors.
I want to know what sections of law will give provision to reopen the case in the subcourt. The lawyer did not even inform me in time that the case was decreed in February and instead he misled me saying that the case is posted for hearing in the last week of March.
Is court fee mandatory for HC appeal in such a case? Does Monetary jurisdiction limitation constraint District Court to interefere? Since the case was conducted in a shady manner by the lawyer by colluding with the plaintiff , what provisions of law will allow the District Court to set aside the subcourt order and to order a remand of the case to the lower subcourt for fresh evidence and trial