LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

narendra.s.p (Chief Manager(Law))     13 April 2012

Res judicata for drt appeals under sarfaesi act

 

Will the principles of Res Judica apply for Appeals preferred under SARFAESI Act in the following case:[same parties-same liability]

Borrower/mortgagor filed Appeal (SA) with DRT Challenging the Possession Notice. The appeal was disposed in favour of Bank

Subsequently he filed another SA challenging Valuation of property by the Bank. This appeal also was also disposed of in favour of the bank

Again he filed one more SA against the Bank challenging the conduct of Auction and confirming bid in favour of single bidder? 



Learning

 3 Replies

RAJU O.F., (Advocate)     15 April 2012

The aggrieved person can prefer Appeal against any measure under Sec.13(4) of the Act, proceeded by the bank.  If the challenge is against the same measure taken by the bank, then res judicata would be applied.

DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g (POWER OF DEFENSE IS IMMENSE )     15 April 2012

No res judicata involved since separate stages.

 

For valuation and other irregularities you can also file civil and criminal actions against the responsible persons.

c.p.s. ramachary (1500)     30 April 2012

Please do not call proceedings filed under Sec.17 of the Act as 'appeal'. It is not appeal. It is application. Appeal lies to DRAT under Sec.18 against order of  DRT passed under Sec 17 of the Act. To avoid confusion please distinguish application (u/s.17) and appeal (u/s 18) of the Act.

Action under the Act consists of four measures  viz 13(4) (a),(b),(c) & (d). Each measure consists of a bundle of steps for taking such action. Such steps have to be taken as contemplated in the s.i.(e) rules without any deviation (expressio unius est exclusio alterius).  It is open to the borrower to challenge legality of such action however within 45 days from the date of cause of action. In such case res judicata has no application. If an order is passed by drt on any particular issue raised by borrower, he cannot file another application u/s17 to dispute the same issue. However filing of a review application on same issue if not dealt by drt in spite of raising in pleas in the application, it is not hit by res judicata. Civil or criminal courts are not conferred with any jurisdiction to deal with the matters falling within the statutory jurisdiction of drt


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register