LCI Learning
Master the Basics of Legal Drafting in All Courts. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

raja (owner)     20 October 2017

Sarfaesi noticeu/s 13(2)

Dear sir,

I have availed a home loan from a nationalised bank. Due to non payment for 3 months my account has been classified as NPA on 14.07.2016. Subsequently Authorised officer of the Bank issued notice u/s 13(2) of SARFAESI act 2002 as balance O/s on 30.6.2016 is Rs 56.00 lakhs. Later after 7 months 3.5.2017, Authorised officer of the Bank issued notice u/s 13(2) of SARFAESI act 2002 as balance O/s on 30.6.2016 is Rs 56.50 lakhs. Objection u/s 13(3A) of sarfaesi act has been submitted to authorised officer, to furnish the details of difference amount Rs 50,000/-. Reply was not clear. Information solicited under RTI act. Reply was not clear.

Additional Information : Exhorbitant interst had been charged to my loan account , was confessed by CPIO.

Untill, I receive 13(4) notice I cannot escalate to DRT.

My query :

1) How to find the difference amount of Rs 50,000 spelled in sarfaesi notice 13(2)?



 5 Replies

Nitish Banka (lawyer)     20 October 2017

wait for 13(4) notice approach DRT take a stay

1 Like

raja (owner)     21 October 2017

Dear Sir, Thanks for your early reply. Kindly clarify the query. How much fee i have to pay for stay in DRT, as my O/s balance is 56.00 lakhs. How the calculation is made ?.

Thanks in advance.

surendra prakash agrawal (advocate)     21 October 2017

SARFAESI ACT of 2002 is a technical act where 

1. Bank should classify the a/c NPA as on 14.07.17 inclusive of interest @ ..% having O/S as on 14.04.17. (When either interest or instalments remain in default for more than 90 days than a/c will be identified as NPA). In instant case, Bank has committed a default and violated RBI directives upon NPA. 

2. You have option to knock the door of applicable DRT u/s 17(1) of SARFAESI Act and you have to pay a fee U/s 13(2) 1.(b) where the applicant is a borrower and the amount of debt due is Rs.10 lacs and above, Rs.5,000/- +Rs.250/- for every Rs.1 lac or part thereof in excess of Rs.10 lac, subject to a maximum of rs.1,00,000/-. There will be some more fee of rs.250/- for seeking stay and other instant relief.   

2-A: whereas Bank may file Original Application U/S 19 of RDDB (DRT) Act 1993 and fee will be paid by Bank.

3. Bank has two options to take sympolic possession U/s 13(4) and/or U/S 14 of SARFAESI act through District Magistrate /CMM in which the property exists and mortgage is created to securer the secured creditor. You may file objections with DM/CMM in advance to contest the same.

Feel free to discuss but with complete facts of the case. No blind comments can be offered.

 

 

    

1 Like

raja (owner)     21 October 2017

Thanks Sir.

Law Aspire (Legal)     23 November 2017

Originally posted by : surendra prakash agrawal
SARFAESI ACT of 2002 is a technical act where 

1. Bank should classify the a/c NPA as on 14.07.17 inclusive of interest @ ..% having O/S as on 14.04.17. (When either interest or instalments remain in default for more than 90 days than a/c will be identified as NPA). In instant case, Bank has committed a default and violated RBI directives upon NPA. 

2. You have option to knock the door of applicable DRT u/s 17(1) of SARFAESI Act and you have to pay a fee U/s 13(2) 1.(b) where the applicant is a borrower and the amount of debt due is Rs.10 lacs and above, Rs.5,000/- +Rs.250/- for every Rs.1 lac or part thereof in excess of Rs.10 lac, subject to a maximum of rs.1,00,000/-. There will be some more fee of rs.250/- for seeking stay and other instant relief.   

2-A: whereas Bank may file Original Application U/S 19 of RDDB (DRT) Act 1993 and fee will be paid by Bank.

3. Bank has two options to take sympolic possession U/s 13(4) and/or U/S 14 of SARFAESI act through District Magistrate /CMM in which the property exists and mortgage is created to securer the secured creditor. You may file objections with DM/CMM in advance to contest the same.

Feel free to discuss but with complete facts of the case. No blind comments can be offered.

 

 

    

why 14.07.2017 it must be 14.07.2016

1 Like

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register