Can anybody explain the "real implications" of the Supreme court judgment in the case of S.Bhagirathi Ammal v/s Palani Roman Catholic Mission, 2008, SC
Here it was held by the SC (3-judge) that Review of the judgment (due to change in statutory Act) is possible even after decree was passed but had not been finally executed. Now the question is -- Does the above principle applies in the case where after the judgments, but before the execution of decree, if a NEW Case Law is pronounced by a higher court ?