Hi all,
Do you think that a husband in a divorce case who has defaulted in payment of interim maintenance for 1 year, failed to cross examine for 3 years, and failed to appear in the fast track court for more than 4 hearings even after getting notice of transfer of case to fast track court should be granted the application for setting aside of exparte order ?
I feel that some lawyers use setting aside of exparte order provision as their delay tactics, as they dont appear in the court for along time and when an exparte order is passed , suddenly they make an appearance in the court and file an application for setting aside of exparte order.
I think that in family matters the court should not be lenient in accepting an application to set aside exparte order, as this used to prolong the case again and cause undue delay and hardship to the other party who has been sincerely attending to the court proceedings.
I would request my colleagues to post their valuable opinion on this issue.
Regards,
Ria