This is not USA-HC tells married man in live-in relationship

very bad , VIOLATION of Right to Freedom under COI.

agree with Avnish Kaur

"This is not America. You have no right under the Hindu Marriage Act to marry twice.'

IN AMERICA ALSO ONE CAN NOT MARRY TWICE.

THE PRESENT HMA IS MORE WESTERNIZED - THAN INDIANIZED.

YES IT IS NOT ONLY VIOLATION OF ART 21, COI, ALSO AGAINST THE PRESENT SC RULLING ON LIVE IN RELATIONSHIP.

" who asked the court for protection as they feared a threat to their lives from her family members. "

THEY ARE FEARED OF HONOUR KILLING.

SUCH ILL ADVICES  ONLY ENCOURAGE THE HONOUR KILLERS.
 

"I will not allow you for this."
 

- THOSE WHO ARE GOING ON LIVE IN, NEED NOT REQUIRE UNWANTED ADVICES.

THEY HAVE TO CHECK THAT THERE ACT DO NOT CROSS THE BORDERLINE OF LEGALITY.

I ALSO ADVICED THE SAME BY THE JUSTICE AND INFORMED THE COURT, THEN AND THERE, THAT, - I DON'T REQUIRE THIS ADVICE, AM MATURED ONE AND HAVE SUFFICIENT INTELEGENCE TO FACE THE THINGS. 

It is nothing but a gross violation of rights guaranteed under COI. The Supremecourt verdict on live in relationship is altogether different from what the parties calim in the present case. 

GOD where are U and where R U leading this country.

I ALSO ADVICED THE SAME BY THE JUSTICE AND INFORMED THE COURT, THEN AND THERE, THAT, - I DON'T REQUIRE THIS ADVICE, AM MATURED ONE AND HAVE SUFFICIENT INTELEGENCE TO FACE THE THINGS. 

Arup jee,you are sounding very tensed here.dont worry.no one will harm you and her.enjoy life!

@Deeksh*tulu.V.S.R

I dont understand wot u mean sir

.are u in favour of live in relations when one or both lovers are married,or are u against it?

you are sounding very tensed here

-  sorry, i am not tensd at that time and now also.

enjoy life!

- thanks.

life is for enjoyment and doing assigned duties.

everyone get enjoyment in his / her  life.

@author, nice post .

I am very much surprised how Courts say contractictory things.I read a post few days back in this forum where a 18 year old girl is protected by Court in live in relationship with a married man from her family members.How she got protection in doing a illegal thing??As per SC both parties should be unmarried in a valid live in relationship.

yes, what ms utpala says are my opinion also.

WHERE LIFE IS AT STAKE, THE FIRST JOB OF A COURT OR POLICE IS TO PROTECT THE LIFE & LIBERTY OR RESIST THE WICKED PERSONS.

As per SC both parties should be unmarried in a valid live in relationship

- NOT VERY PERFECT.

- iT IS TO BE SEEN THAT, THE FEMALE MUST NOT BE A WIFE OF A PERSON.

This is the only thing which is in favour of men in the world of these biased laws. who has been desseerted by his wife just to fulfill the requirement of her parents and to complete the commitment which she had done with their b/fs before marriage.

@ Roshni

I think you r  living in the decade of 1990-2000

If you come in the society(2000-10) then you will realize what is the exact situation is right now.

What will u say about those girls/ladies who just desserted her husbands and file file 498A/DP act./125CRPS

Then Wait for husband to file divorce and wait for Huge Alimony.

As per Roshni, he still has to wait for her to come. Is it fare?

Everybody in india is aware of the facts that these laws are getting misused(Even supreme court.)

I think now supreme courd has realised and atleast made this law in favour of Men

Thanks to the Justice of SC

I am wondering when the Judge says that  "This is not USA-HC tells married man in live-in relationship", doesnt he know that all the laws in India are not made by India but are copied (and customized) from Ancient Roman Law & English Common Law??