In an Anticipatory Bail application for the accused, the Counsel for the accused signed the application and the surety or the (pairokar) for the applicant siged the Vakalatnama in the name of the accused along with an affidavit. But the Session Judge was of the view that the vakalatnama has to be signed only by the accused who was under medical treatment outside the State at the time of moving the application and refused to entertain the application till the accused signed the Vakalat. Is this approach of the Session Judge legal and proper?