@ MANKU,
Here is the judgment, I hope it will be helpful to you as you needed it urgently.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3723 OF 2012
Balakrishnan S. Periyaswamy .. Petitioner
V/s.
Kalaiarasi B. Periyaswamy .. Respondent
.....
Mr. A. M. Vernekar for the Petitioner.
Mr. Harish D. Joshi for the Respondent.
.....
CORAM : SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.
DATE : JUNE 26, 2012.
P.C.:
Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith.
2. The Petitionerhusband
filed an Application for amendment of
his Petition of divorce in the Family Court No.2, Bandra Mumbai. The
Court by its order dated 29th February, 2012 rejected the Application.
The order sets out the events showing the cruelty of the husband and
his family members. The order shows that those were events
subsequent to the filing of the Petition. The order also shows that they
are malafide.
3. It is contended on behalf of the Respondentwife
that the
Petitioner has not made out any case for cruelty in the Petition. If that
is so, the subsequent events would not make out any case of cruelty as
on the date of the Petition. The events subsequent to the Petition
would remains events of such dates.
4. The Respondent has refuted those incidents. If those incidents
form part of the pleadings that require to be refuted and the denial
would be seen by the Court.
5. It may be mentioned that the cruelty, if any, alleged in the
Petition would have to be proved as on the date of the Petition. The
other incidents which are of later dates would be seen by the Judge
hearing the Petition on merits as of those later dates. It would be for
the Judge at the time of hearing to conclude whether or not that
amounted to cruelty and that would be only after taking into account
the defence, if any, of the Respondent on merits.
6. Amendments cannot be refused on the ground that subsequent
events are denied. Hence, the order deserves to be interfered with.
The order dated 29th February, 2012 is set aside. The amendments
sought by the Petitionerhusband
are allowed. The Petitionerhusband
shall amend the Petition in the Family Court, within two weeks from
today. He shall also amend the copy of the Petition served upon the
Respondentwife
within two weeks from today. The Petition shall
proceed on merits.
7. Rule is made absolute to the above extent.
(ROSHAN DALVI, J.)