Purchased of property through stolen money:

In this case no offense on part of A as his act will not come under Sec. 411 IPC. The car can be attached.

But consider a case where the serial numbers of stolen currency notes were known to the complainant and it was mentioned in the FIS. If A still have possession of those money he received from B for selling his car, those currency notes can be seized from A by the investigating agency as it is stolen property. Even then A cannot be implicated in the case unless it is proved that he received the money knowing that it was stolen property.

Thank you Feroz, but lets wait for more.

I am very much agree with the view of Mr Firoz

In the said case sec 414 also to be attracted. But the police didnt do so. but considering the facts of the case Sec 411 says whoever dishonestly receive or retains the stolen property knowingly or having reason to belive to be stolen" so there should be dishonest intention and there should be knowledge that the property is stolen which are to be proved by the prosecution in this case. Moreover as stated in the case A has already invested the money in the business even if the complainant knows that serial No. the same currency is to be recovered from A to prove the case This will prove fatal to the case of prosecution.