Regarding ni act case

If you succeed to prove that accused had issued a cheque against legally enforceable debt or liabilty then definitely you will win the case and accused shall be punished for the offence of cheque bounceing ( sec 138 of N.I.Act. ).

Goyal sir,

 

 

I asked you about apples you replied on oranges.

 

Please read my query again 

It's a discretion of court otherwise we will pronounce your order and provide apples instead of oranges just have patience order will come soon then decide its a Apples or Oranges and as per covid part is concern everyone suffered so only court will consider that facts no one else.

Anubhav Bhatt sir,

 

Thanks for your reply.  incase if you have to take a guess, can I get double the cheque amount ?

why I am asking this again is,  I lost good time bcause of covid, lawyer fees, court expenses and all. if I get just cheque amount its injustice. 

I know no one can predict perfectly. just a guess. 

@ Gayatri Gayatri,

I fully agree and endorse the opinion and advise of expert Mr. Bhartesh Goyal who has obliged you with "apples" but not "orange" as remarked / misunderstood by you. 

You have also agreed that no one can predict as to the outcome of the case especially the punishment /fine  imposed and compensation to be awarded in favour of complainant, which is discretion of the Court with limitation to double the cheque amount and / or 2 years imprisionment as provided in Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

 

Basically this is not an astrological forum.

 

This forum is also not spokesperson of the court where the case is going on.

 

And the experts offering view here are doing a charitable activity spending their own time / electricity and net connection. 

 

Therefore the sarcastic comments on Mr Goyal are not welcome.