What are the differences between two SC rullings Commissioner Of Income-Tax ... vs Podar Cement Pvt. Ltd. Etc on 27 May, 1997
AND
Suraj Lamps & Industries Pvt Ltd. v. State of Haryana and another.
Poddar cements rulling says no matters even agreements not registered
Suraj lamp case says SA/GPOA/WILL are to be registered
And also says in the
Very important paras in suraj lamp case..
*However, while the Supreme Court held such transactions to be invalid, it also clarified that such observations were in no way intended to affect the validity of sale agreements and powers of attorney executed in genuine transactions*
Then
One more para says
*Lastly, it also clarified that any genuine or good-faith transactions would not be invalidated by this decision*
