27 evidence act

salilkumarp (Querist) 13 September 2008 This query is : Resolved
two accused persons were tried for an offence u/s 379 r/w 34 ipc. 2 nd accused was im- plicated on the basis of an alleged confession of 1 st accused.how far ths confession admissible, especially when recovery was effected from 1 st accused ?

Follow Query

Report Abuse

ARVIND JAIN (Expert) 17 September 2008
If no recovery on the basis of the discloser, cofession not applicable on the 2nd accused.
I leave it open for further comments.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Family property issue
Muslim man triple talaq after 36 years
Love spells to return your ex-lover back
Https://purewellnessketogummies.sites.kaltura.com/
Is it legal to buy property in panvel's usarli khurd area?
Purchase of goodwill for ca firm
False allegations
How to remove other right from agricultural land
Obc caste certificate
138 ni act

Certain doubt -sof - on appeals to the higher courts
Is advocate guilty?
Advocate�s duty to justice apply to the pre-litigation ?
Ucc laws on inheritance
Family settlement
Complaint against medical facility
Legal opinion on baseless legal notice and law
Legal notice or ........
Dismissals due to defective legal notices
Legal notice content