Blood relations trapped me, my wife and my innocent daughters through dv act and maitenance act
V K Dalal
(Querist) 24 November 2011
This query is : Resolved
Dear Sir,
Our judiciary and administrative system protects women, but it has been used to disintegrate families through malafied intentions of one or two members of the family members. Today, our Social and Family values have completely ruined in the name of Woman’s Protection Acts. If one has to understand the culture and ethical value of any state or country, he simply has to see the reflections through a few Indian Families. Picture would be true reflection of that particular country. Our leaders responsible towards National Development are hoarding the 99% of the resources. Corrupt practices and unethical social outcome has polluted even the families and vice a versa. When family's can not be saved, how one can expect that India would be saved.
Me and my family is one of the recent victims due to Woman’s Protection acts. In our society, any women crying with false allegations easily gets the public, judicial and administrative attention and sympathy resulting in bombardment on innocent husbands/mans who become respondents in the proceedings. Under woman's protection acts, husband and man are targeted, fixed and framed and ultimately get trapped. Their pleading for his innocence goes in deaf years, and it becomes highly non-productive activity for him, consequently his own life and carrier jolts.
O' GOD, give some wisdom to these evil women and their maligned agents that man and his family can live with minimum happiness. Family Life otherwise is also full of struggles in the current scenario, and over which, if one is accidentally trapped through so to say Woman's Protection Acts, he would have HELL of a time ahead and would only suffer agony and distress throughout.
Is there any visionary reformer surviving, to give effective protection system to the MAN and hear their cries????
vkdalal
ajay sethi
(Expert) 24 November 2011
it is a fact that 98%of 498A cases filed by women are false .
Supreme Court, in a relatively recent case, Sushil Kumar Sharma vs. Union of India and others[24], observed as:
“The object of the provision is prevention of the dowry menace. But as has been rightly contented by the petitioner that many instances have come to light where the complaints are not bonafide and have been filed with oblique motive. In such cases acquittal of the accused does not in all cases wipe out the ignominy suffered during and prior to trial. Sometimes adverse media coverage adds to the misery. The question, therefore, is what remedial measures can be taken to prevent abuse of the well-intentioned provision. Merely because the provision is constitutional and intra vires, does not give a licence to unscrupulous persons to wreck personal vendetta or unleash harassment. It may, therefore, become necessary for the legislature to find out ways how the makers of frivolous complaints or allegations can be appropriately dealt with. Till then the Courts have to take care of the situation within the existing frame work.
ajay sethi
(Expert) 24 November 2011
Kanaraj vs. State of Punjab, the apex court observed as:
“for the fault of the husband the in-laws or other relatives cannot in all cases be held to be involved. The acts attributed to such persons have to be proved beyond reasonable doubt and they cannot be held responsible by mere conjectures and implications. The tendency to rope in relatives of the husband as accused has to be curbed”
Karnataka High Court, in the case of State Vs. Srikanth, observed as:
“Roping in of the whole of the family including brothers and sisters-in-law has to be depreciated unless there is a specific material against these persons, it is down right on the part of the police to include the whole of the family as accused”
Shonee Kapoor
(Expert) 24 November 2011
You be yourself.
Join SIFF and other organizations fighting against misuse of such laws.
Contact undersigned.
Regards,
Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com
