R/Members
I have a claim case in which a clerk of contractor was injured in a road side accident when a tractor hit his m/cycle from back side.Regd. owner of M/cycle(non-offending) on which injured was going at the time of accident is in the name of contractor i.e. employer of injured.Police registered crl case (FIR)against tractor driver & offending tractor was taken in possesion by police.Now i want to know whether it is necessary to implead contractor i.e. regd owner oif m/cycle as party/respondent alongwith driver,insurer & regd owner of tractor.kindly help
Respected seniors,
Some of the old students are willing to start an organization to help the poor students economically, health of the poor old age persons and to help the poor girls economically at the time of their marriage. To fulfill the above objects of society all of the old students will contribute voluntary yearly subscription. All old students are become members of the said organization.
In the above circumstances what are the precautions to be taken at the time of registration of the said society and what is the procedure to obtain income tax exemption to the contributing members personally to the amount as well as society.
Thanking You Sir in advance.
Person arrested under section 63/65 of copyright act is a bailable offence or not and from which court the accused could get bail so that he may give the actual picture of this conspiracy done with money and mousle power of microsoft india.
Dear Sir / Madam,
Recently i have applied for home loan and got sanction from one of the nationalised bank. I am suppose to pay 70% of the total property cost to builder as the building is under construction. but my question is even though bank is going to give me disbursement of 70% of my sanction amount they are saying that the EMI which i need to pay every month would be same even if they giving 70% of total sanction amount. Is this feasible. It would be great help if you could help me to understand the same.
Regards,
Atanu
My wife Meeta Singh had purchased one samsung star mobile set (Model S5233)from UniverCell shop at Koppikar Road Hubli vide Invoice No. UKA400796 dated 06/09/2009 by paying Rs. 8900/- in cash. But since day one the set get hang while dialling/ receiving call. This is happening atleast 8-10 times in a day since begining. I have reported this defect to the hubli shop, but they had told me that they are responsile for sale only. They are no where concerned with the service. Quote of the manager Mr. Sudhir:-"I have sold the item and my responsibily is over. If you have any problem with the set, please contact samsung service centre". I am stayibg at Dharwad which is 20-25 km away from the said shop as well as samsung service centre. However in the month of October'09 I had reported with my said mobile set to the samsung service centre. They had updated software of the set and handed over to me. But since defect was still unresolved, I had requested to the mentioned shop to please get it rectified. After several request, at last they had agreed to take my phone for service. In the month of Nov.'09 after holding my phone for 10-11 days, they have handed over the set to me with the remarks that "if it continues we will arrange to replace the same". In the mean time I had left for my native place for some personal work for around 25 days. but the problems were continued with the set. Any way in the month of December'09, I had further reported to the shop about the defect. At this time they had taken my phone for 5 days and given back after geting serviced by samsung service centre.
But unfortunately that defects continues. On reporting to the shop as well as to samsung and univercell customer care I was told to submit the phone to the shop.
I had deposited the set to the shop on 30th Dec'09. But since then I am daily trying to contact shop manager but he is not picking up my phone. One customer care executive Miss Lata had suggested me to call UniverCell state head Mr. Balaji as she is also not able to contact Mr. Shop Manager However at last Mr. shop manager has picked up my phone and told that there is no any problems with the phone.
At this stage I am not able to understand what to do?
Please suggest me what to do?
Regards
I am resident of a registered society in Mumbai and seek advise. Some of the members of the society has purchased the Servant's Toilet built by the Builder, as shown in the Plan passed by the BMC. Can a builder sell the place which was built as servant's toilet to any such member?
Secondly the builder had built up the said Servant's Toilet as room and now members who have purchased are used the same as either store room or office with computer and other accessories. Under the situation can the Society charge them and if yes under which Bye-Laws/ Societies Act? Kindly advice. Thanks Jitendra
My fried is a constable in CISF. he passed the LDCE Exam and became eligible for being promoted to Sub Inspector directly. But he was not sent for training of SI.EXE for the reason that a case registered under Section 498A IPC on a false complaint by his wife was pending. I had earlier come across a decision in SCC that pendency of criminal case is not a bar to promotion, which I am now not able to recollect or search it out. The CISF people have taken a stand that he can be promoted only after producing an acquittal order in the criminal case. Though he was sent for basic training and has completed Police Attachment and is now in Pre-Commando training, he is still retained as a Constable and is paid only the salary of a Constable. All others who attended training were given salary of Sub Inspector from the day of starting of Basic Training amd were awarded the Rank of Sub Inspector, immediatly on completion of training, except my friend .There is no rule in CISF Act or Rules prohibiting promotion for the reason of pendency of a ctiminal case.
Kindly advice me what is to be done and if possible kindly send me the Judgement of the case regardig the finding that pendency of a criminal case is not a bar to promotion reported in Supreme Court Cases.
The employees of Insurance Co. have destroyed original policy form submitted by policy holder & made forged signatures of policy holder on fresh policy form & submitted. After the bond was received, The policy holder saw it on the photocopy of the form attached with bond. After complaining, the Insurance Co. by saving their employees denied the tampering but the forged signatures made are clearly manifest on the form. What are the strict laws especially in Insurance laws available to be slapped against Insurance Co. for committing fraud ?
Is there any provision of compulsory lock in shares acquired under open offer- take over code?
constitutional bench in supreme court
R/Members
Minimum how many judges are required for a constitutional bench in supreme court.Kindly advice .
Regards